Maybe we need a full debate in the House about the issue Mr. Patterson is raising, about what is the position of the MLAs as it relates to Development Corporation operations. Maybe that is the debate here. Because, what I now hear him saying is that he doesn't want these jobs to be subsidized. That is what the policies that are in place say. Would he prefer that we didn't subsidize the jobs and everybody was left to be on welfare? I don't want to start an argument here, but let's get a debate going in the House. Let's see what Mr. Ng thinks, let's see what Mr. Antoine thinks. If the majority of people feel that way, then we'll stop doing it.
But, it is my understanding that we have the mandate to subsidize capital, to subsidize jobs, where we are creating employment opportunities for people in Level II and III communities, where there is a desperate, desperate level of unemployment. Here is a unique opportunity to do that in a fishery that we never had up until 1990. We've got a minor problem which can be resolved and we are having an argumentative debate about it in the House. So maybe we should be debating the bigger issue and let's see where the honourable Members stand on this Development Corporation position and policy. Thank you.