Like the chairman of the standing committee said, some of the responses have been not too good, and sometimes, when they are not too good it's because there is not adequate time to deal with the issue and try to get the information to provide a good response.
The other thing that I want to bring to the attention of the Members, as well, is that we do have health boards, and it's fine to indicate that the department has an overall two year plan, but we also have to work with the health boards, because, in many instances, the health boards jealously guard their jurisdiction or their home plate, and so it takes us some time to try to work with them. So I just didn't want us to be in another situation where we are being accused again of not being able to meet the deadline. I know that the Member has said that they have travelled to communities and talked to health boards. I think that, with the other people and the magnitude of the problems we do have, this is not an easy program to deliver and try to satisfy all of our constituents.
So the health boards have to be part of some of the answers so that the action plan could be presented, and I don't want us to have to do something so quickly that we have a not a good action plan. So that's just my concern. Thank you.