This is page numbers 943 - 976 of the Hansard for the 12th Assembly, 7th Session. The original version can be accessed on the Legislative Assembly's website or by contacting the Legislative Assembly Library. The word of the day was chairman.

Topics

Bill 1: Appropriation Act, No. 2, 1995-96Committee Report 4-12(7): Report On The Review Of The 1995-96 Main Estimates
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 964

Stephen Kakfwi

Stephen Kakfwi Sahtu

Mr. Chairman, there is a school of thought that says the same thing as the Member: everything is well the way it is so we shouldn't change anything. It is true that some communities have other priorities at this time. For instance, the Dogrib are focused very much on their claim, self-government negotiations; and business interests also seem to be occupying a great deal of their time.

We have economic development positions that are answerable right now, not to the communities, not to the Dogrib, but to this government. The Dogrib seem content to leave it the way it is. We have renewable resource officer positions in the Dogrib communities; again, they are not directly answerable to the Dogrib. Some communities have decided they want to do something about that, and we have done work with them. The Dogrib feel that is okay for now and that is their business. This initiative is community-driven and we are not going around beating our drum trying to get the Dogrib or anybody else to say...They have to show that we are needed and that this initiative has to be shown to be highly in demand, otherwise we're a flop.

The government has shown a tremendous initiative here; I believe very, very strongly in it and so does this government. As communities are prepared to move...It is not a big deal, it is not any great initiative to request that Lac La Martre should take over the economic development officer position; they have recently expressed interest in doing that. There is no great magic trick to it, you just ask if you can take that over by coming to an arrangement with the government, you do the same with renewable officer positions and we are in business.

These people can, on a day-to-day basis, answer directly to the Dogrib authority, whatever it is in those communities, if that is what the expressed wish is; but if they don't want to do it at this time, that is fine. I just tell them that this government stands ready to do business, and we are doing it. The Member is saying I don't think you are doing any work. I disagree with him categorically. We wouldn't be here today if the Member had won the day in the Legislature three years ago; not at all.

Bill 1: Appropriation Act, No. 2, 1995-96Committee Report 4-12(7): Report On The Review Of The 1995-96 Main Estimates
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 964

The Chair John Ningark

Thank you. Mr. Patterson.

Bill 1: Appropriation Act, No. 2, 1995-96Committee Report 4-12(7): Report On The Review Of The 1995-96 Main Estimates
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 964

Dennis Patterson Iqaluit

Mr. Chairman, I want to make it clear that I am enthusiastic about community transfer. I would love to

see it happen; I think it is key to the very credibility of this government in many parts of the Northwest Territories, to enhancing the credibility of this government. It is critical to spreading employment opportunities in Nunavut, that we have a success with community transfer.

When I was in Cabinet in the previous Legislature, we tried very hard to deliver on community transfer, and I can say without shame that we failed miserably; it didn't work. Although there were a lot of efforts and Mr. Wray was the Minister then in charge, he had every commitment and personal dedication in the world to this, it never happened. Yes, there were a few economic development officers transferred. Yes, there were a few other government PYs transferred. But in the sense of giving communities real powers to set priorities, handle significant amounts of money, control their own lives at the community level, we made no progress.

I have to, with the greatest respect, say to the Minister that especially considering the numerous person years and sizable financial resources that have been put in this area over the last three years, I don't think that we have made an awful lot of progress with this government either. And I want to say clearly, I don't think it is from lack of effort or commitment on the part of the Minister and his staff. Somehow we haven't quite got the formula to make it work. I suspect it has to do with the nature of bureaucracies; there is a certain interdepartmental rivalry and there is a certain kind of resistance to giving away authority to communities so that we have to fight in order to make it happen.

I don't want to criticize anyone, Mr. Chairman, but I think the purpose of this committee is to look at the amount of money that we are dedicating to this task and deciding whether we are getting value for money. I look at eight person years and I, frankly, wonder what they are doing. Now we have an answer that two or three of them are not there and they are doing other good work.

There are real problems with this community transfer arrangement. I will speak for Nunavut because I know about Nunavut; we have paid great attention to the Cape Dorset experience in the Baffin. We held a leaders' meeting in Dorset to find out first hand how they had done it, we were hoping that our communities could profit from the Dorset experience.

What have we learned -- and it was put together in a resolution at our last Baffin leaders' summit -- is that the training and community development component has to be enhanced and that the absence of a component in training and community development is an impediment.

We recommended that it would be more appropriate if personnel who have a presence and credibility in the region -- through being known in the region -- deliver the CTI programs, rather than people from headquarters who are not well-known. I am not questioning their abilities, but they are not known to the community leaders and, therefore, there are barriers for that reason.

We noted the problems about the barriers the Financial Administration Act imposes to block funding, which I know Mr. Pollard is trying to correct through an amendment to these

main estimates, and I know Mr. Kakfwi has been looking at solutions. But, nonetheless, that has been an impediment.

We also had a serious discussion about the fact that the wide-open menu -- pick and choose as you see fit -- may not be as effective as we might have hoped, even though it's extremely democratic. In fact, if communities instead had two or three choices of medium, large and small responsibilities and models were developed, we might have more take-up, rather than leaving it wide open and, therefore, leaving communities quite uncertain about what to take.

There also seems to have been, and all you have to do is talk to the good people who were involved in Cape Dorset, quite a labyrinth of an approval process. Maybe ground has been broken, it's simpler now, and Dorset has paved the way to an easier process. But, if you talk to them, as we did, they said it was a pretty tough process. They spoke very highly of Mr. Kakfwi's personal commitment, but they had to journey to Yellowknife at great expense more than once to make it all happen. I don't want to rant and rave on and on here, Mr. Chairman, but I do want to support Mr. Zoe. I have to say, despite the effort, the money, and the eight person years, I don't know if we've got an awful lot to show for it.

I think we should be honest here with ourselves and say nobody is questioning the effort that was put into it, but somehow it is not taking. I would have thought housing for sure would have. In the early months of this government, it seemed there was a lot of interest in the Dene communities in housing because it is a visible, important program and Dene communities had taken initiatives in building their own housing, particularly block funding and things like that. Housing seems noticeably absent in the list of successful community transfers.

I don't know what has gone wrong and I don't want to blame anybody, but I would have to say, for the amount of effort we're putting into it, something has to change. Maybe the answer is not to reduce these PYs -- although that is something that Members of this committee have to ask: if you need that many PYs -- maybe the answer is to change the whole approach. I would hope, now that we're in the last year of this government, that the Minister and his officials will search their souls and ask if we had to do it over again, would we do it over again? Would we do it differently? Are there ways of improving this? How can we make it happen?

We all want it to happen but, largely, it doesn't seem to have happened. I acknowledge the progress made here and there. I'm not diminishing how important the oil and gas transfer was for Norman Wells. But, really, in terms of communities grabbing hold of their own lives, not including Dorset and Good Hope, we haven't got a lot of examples to show yet. Maybe a number of them are being nurtured and are going to happen.

Bill 1: Appropriation Act, No. 2, 1995-96Committee Report 4-12(7): Report On The Review Of The 1995-96 Main Estimates
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 965

The Chair John Ningark

Thank you. While the committee is within my reach, I would like to remind all the honourable Members that I will only allow a 10-minute speech for each

Member at any one time. I should have done that from the beginning of this committee meeting. Also, I would like to remind each and every honourable Member and the Minister to try to refrain from statements that may have implications of provoking serious arguments between Members. Mr. Minister.

Bill 1: Appropriation Act, No. 2, 1995-96Committee Report 4-12(7): Report On The Review Of The 1995-96 Main Estimates
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 966

Stephen Kakfwi

Stephen Kakfwi Sahtu

Mr. Chairman, I agree they shouldn't be provocative. In response to the Member for Iqaluit, I still say categorically, we would be in deep doo-doo if this government was not prepared and had not assigned the kinds of resources it had some three years ago to this task. Members were clamouring, saying what is this government waiting for; why is it not assigning staff for this very, very important function that everybody in the eastern Arctic wants to discuss? It's not easy to conjure up the reaction if we had done nothing.

I have to remind Members that they were wondering why we couldn't assign a fixed budget for this initiative when we first introduced it. I had refused to put a budget on it because I had said I cannot do it until I have a realistic idea about how much it would require. I know that if it was too low, it would be severely criticized as a motley commitment to an initiative that is in high demand in the communities. I suffer now with the probability, at least in the view of the two Members, of having assigned too much money to this task. I don't disagree with the Members there.

They will note as the details come out that there is, in fact, a proposed reduction in the area of community transfers for the coming year. We acknowledge that the amount of money we have assigned to this task is more than we what we require. I'm prepared to downsize. There's no difficulty. But I say again that we have to be ready and are ready to do business. The work we did in Cape Dorset has been a tremendous achievement. We have worked out many of the kinks and wrinkles and I'm very happy that Cape Dorset took on this initiative at the time it did. We're all doing an evaluation of that.

The Nunavut Implementation Commission has involved itself and wants to be part of that evaluation, as well. They have involved themselves in community transfers and see it as a positive initiative. They want to provide some more suggestions on how we can approach this work. I agree, not all communities are prepared to get involved. Some have said that they recognize that we're ready to do business but they have other priorities. They're not prepared, for whatever reason. The blatant truth is, some communities may not be administratively stable enough to take on community transfers at this time.

Other communities, as I've said, are unable to agree politically or internally. Housing associations may not necessarily agree that the hamlets or other political groups should take them over. We just tell them that we need some agreements before we can conduct business with them. Those kinds of discussions are ongoing, I'm sure. But, until then, we have to be ready. There are a tremendous number of barriers. There are bureaucratic barriers, civil servants who have been very supportive, some loudly silent on the initiative, and some have been blatantly scornful of the initiative from the beginning.

I recognized that from the beginning, as a Minister. People will know from their own communities and regions that some people are actively supporting and encouraging transfers and others are strangely silent about it. Some are almost openly scornful of it. The barriers are there, some are human barriers, some are our own. There's an inability of communities to take them on administratively. There's an inability to find the kinds of personnel they want and need in order to take on these transfers. There is the internal inability at this time to move transfers such as housing. There are staffing concerns that need to be dealt with before people get serious about them. Those are the realities. The fact is we can't shove this initiative down. We can downsize the amount of money that we assign to it, but there is never going to be a day when this government refuses to do transfers. We have opened the door and we can never close the door again.

Bill 1: Appropriation Act, No. 2, 1995-96Committee Report 4-12(7): Report On The Review Of The 1995-96 Main Estimates
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 966

The Chair John Ningark

Thank you. General comments. Do we have further general comments? Shall we get into detail?

Bill 1: Appropriation Act, No. 2, 1995-96Committee Report 4-12(7): Report On The Review Of The 1995-96 Main Estimates
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 966

Some Hon. Members

Agreed.

---Agreed

Line By Line

Bill 1: Appropriation Act, No. 2, 1995-96Committee Report 4-12(7): Report On The Review Of The 1995-96 Main Estimates
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 966

The Chair John Ningark

Okay. On page 02-39, we have intergovernmental and aboriginal affairs, total O and M, $4.215 million.

Bill 1: Appropriation Act, No. 2, 1995-96Committee Report 4-12(7): Report On The Review Of The 1995-96 Main Estimates
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 966

Some Hon. Members

Agreed.

---Agreed

Bill 1: Appropriation Act, No. 2, 1995-96Committee Report 4-12(7): Report On The Review Of The 1995-96 Main Estimates
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 966

The Chair John Ningark

Thank you. On page 02-40, details of grants and contributions, grants, $250,000.

Bill 1: Appropriation Act, No. 2, 1995-96Committee Report 4-12(7): Report On The Review Of The 1995-96 Main Estimates
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 966

Some Hon. Members

Agreed.

---Agreed

Bill 1: Appropriation Act, No. 2, 1995-96Committee Report 4-12(7): Report On The Review Of The 1995-96 Main Estimates
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 966

The Chair John Ningark

Thank you. Grants and contributions, contributions, $700,000.

Bill 1: Appropriation Act, No. 2, 1995-96Committee Report 4-12(7): Report On The Review Of The 1995-96 Main Estimates
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 966

Some Hon. Members

Agreed.

---Agreed

Bill 1: Appropriation Act, No. 2, 1995-96Committee Report 4-12(7): Report On The Review Of The 1995-96 Main Estimates
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 966

The Chair John Ningark

Grants and contributions, $950,000.

Bill 1: Appropriation Act, No. 2, 1995-96Committee Report 4-12(7): Report On The Review Of The 1995-96 Main Estimates
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 966

Some Hon. Members

Agreed.

---Agreed

Bill 1: Appropriation Act, No. 2, 1995-96Committee Report 4-12(7): Report On The Review Of The 1995-96 Main Estimates
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 966

The Chair John Ningark

Thank you. On the next page we have detail of work performed on behalf of third parties, total program $461,000.

Bill 1: Appropriation Act, No. 2, 1995-96Committee Report 4-12(7): Report On The Review Of The 1995-96 Main Estimates
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 966

Some Hon. Members

Agreed.

---Agreed

Bill 1: Appropriation Act, No. 2, 1995-96Committee Report 4-12(7): Report On The Review Of The 1995-96 Main Estimates
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 967

The Chair John Ningark

Back to the program summary, Ministry of Intergovernmental and Aboriginal Affairs program summary, page 02-38, total O and M, $4.215 million.

Bill 1: Appropriation Act, No. 2, 1995-96Committee Report 4-12(7): Report On The Review Of The 1995-96 Main Estimates
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 967

Some Hon. Members

Agreed.

---Agreed

Bill 1: Appropriation Act, No. 2, 1995-96Committee Report 4-12(7): Report On The Review Of The 1995-96 Main Estimates
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 967

The Chair John Ningark

Thank you. Are we agreed that we have concluded this particular department?

Bill 1: Appropriation Act, No. 2, 1995-96Committee Report 4-12(7): Report On The Review Of The 1995-96 Main Estimates
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 967

Some Hon. Members

Agreed.

---Agreed

Bill 1: Appropriation Act, No. 2, 1995-96Committee Report 4-12(7): Report On The Review Of The 1995-96 Main Estimates
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 967

The Chair John Ningark

I would like to thank the honourable Minister and his witnesses for appearing before the committee. I think you have earned your money today, Mr. Kakfwi.

Department Of Personnel

The next department, according to the agreement we have, is Personnel. Madam Premier, do you have opening remarks on the Department of Personnel?

Minister's Introductory Remarks

Bill 1: Appropriation Act, No. 2, 1995-96Committee Report 4-12(7): Report On The Review Of The 1995-96 Main Estimates
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 967

Nellie Cournoyea Nunakput

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The budget proposal for Personnel is $4.1 million and 38.4 PYs.

As you know, Personnel continues to recruit for all public service positions, except those in the NWT Housing Corporation, Workers' Compensation Board, health boards and teaching positions with school boards. For these organizations, Personnel develops procedures, provides guidance and advice and conducts operational reviews of staffing procedures.

In addition to the money needed to continue the recruiting program, the estimates reflect an increased emphasis on training, compliance and the promotion of the government as an employer.

In addition, Personnel intends to increase the frequency of its operational reviews this fiscal year. The reviews will help to improve the application of the government staffing process throughout the territories. Eight operational reviews are scheduled. As well, a process has been developed to monitor

satisfaction with personal services from both the client department and applicant perspective.

Finally, I want to take this opportunity to provide Members with an overview of how we are addressing the hiring of students this summer. Mr. Chairman, the government has already received over 190 applications for employment in response to 1,527 packages sent by Personnel to students receiving financial assistance from the Department of Education.

The package provided information on summer employment and encouraged students to submit their resumes. A letter to deputy ministers encouraged them to hire students this summer at headquarters and in the regions was also distributed in February. A staffing officer met with departmental coordinators to discuss summer students and review the casual employment guidelines.

In the regions, a Personnel office, in conjunction with Education, Culture and Employment, will coordinate student placement within government departments and provide counselling sessions. Education's career centres will assist students with their job search in the private sector.

In Yellowknife, the government has entered into a partnership with the Chamber of Commerce and Human Resource Development Canada that will result in a one-stop shop for students looking for summer work. An office location for the centre will be announced in the near future.

Under the partnership arrangement, the chamber will operate the centre and will contact employers for job listing, advertise vacancies and match students to positions. Human Resource Development Canada will provide funding for operating costs. The territorial government will provide furnishings for career development seminars, post job advertisements and provide personnel advice.

In addition, an information session for Yellowknife students will be held the first week in May. Representatives from the Department of Education, Culture and Employment, the career development section, the Yellowknife Chamber of Commerce and Personnel will be in attendance to provide information to students or respond to any questions they may have. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

At this point, I am prepared to respond to any questions Members may have.

Bill 1: Appropriation Act, No. 2, 1995-96Committee Report 4-12(7): Report On The Review Of The 1995-96 Main Estimates
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 967

The Chair

The Chair Tony Whitford

Thank you, Madam Premier. The chair recognizes the Member for North Slave, Mr. Zoe.

Standing Committee On Finance Comments

Bill 1: Appropriation Act, No. 2, 1995-96Committee Report 4-12(7): Report On The Review Of The 1995-96 Main Estimates
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 967

Henry Zoe

Henry Zoe North Slave

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. On behalf of the Standing Committee on Finance, I would like to make a report with regard to Personnel.

The Impact Of Reorganization

As we noted last year, Personnel has essentially been stripped. Three functions remain. These functions are recruitment, workforce adjustment and staff housing. The staff housing function was originally scheduled for transfer to the Housing Corporation by April 1, 1994. However, that transfer has been delayed to April 1, 1995.

The Premier indicated that further changes to the department were imminent. In any case, committee Members feel that the issue of the department's future should be resolved quickly.

Student Summer Employment Program

For many years, Mr. Chairman, the government has provided an employment program for students in the summer months that is the best in the country for both aboriginal and non-aboriginal students. This program has provided northern students with work experience which was relevant to their course of studies and increased the usefulness of the student when they completed school and began permanent work. Within the program there has been a priority system to ensure northern students received the available jobs rather than students from the south.

Last summer, as a result of mishandling the situation by the department, the program unfortunately became the centre of a controversy which had strong racial overtones. The committee feels that the situation was not handled as well as it could have been and a simple misunderstanding became a major issue.

For the coming summer, the committee expects the department will provide clear direction so the public and students understand the program, its objectives and how it will operate.

Video Recruitment

In response to recommendations of the committee, the department has begun using video conference calls for job interviews rather than flying southern candidates north. This provides a major cost savings. About five years ago, NorthwesTel promised it would implement enhanced technology in the north. This technology would have assisted departments such as Personnel in reducing travel and meeting costs. However, the proposed technology has never been fully implemented. The committee urges the government to continue pressing NorthwesTel to implement technology which would allow all northerners to communicate more effectively.

Mr. Chairman, that concludes the comments from the Standing Committee on Finance. Thank you.