That's my concern. What happens if it doesn't? What happens come April 1, 1996? There is an election in the fall, there could be a new slate of officers coming into a government that has an accumulated debt. Decisions are made all the time that impact ongoing years in terms of contracts, commitments and what not. A lot of the people -- and Ms. Mike referred to it -- are impacted by no design of their own, it's just a timing thing. I'm just wondering how this was accounted for in this bill. We're putting the onus on the Ministers, and rightly so because they're in the inner circle; they make the big decisions and get paid the big dollars. But all 24 Members are involved in approving the budget. So it's ludicrous to say we're going to fire all 24 Members because they incurred a deficit. I'm just making a point to support what Becky had said.
I'm just wondering how this was delivered in this bill and whether or not the amendments are going to address this.