Mr. Chairman, it is my understanding that clause 4 was agreed to yesterday. Mr. Ningark's proposed motion was to add a new clause, which would be numbered as clause 4.1, but it is a brand new clause. It has nothing to do with the previously approved clause 4. So if the Member wishes to add another new clause to the bill, then that is quite permissible at this stage. Our concern would be regarding what would happen to 4.1. It is quite in order for Mr. Antoine, if he wishes to propose a motion that would add a new clause 4.2, to do that at this stage.
Clerk Of The House (Mr. David Hamilton) on Committee Motion 71-12(7): To Defer Committee Motion 70-12(7), Carried
In the Legislative Assembly on June 16th, 1995. See this statement in context.
Committee Motion 71-12(7): To Defer Committee Motion 70-12(7), Carried
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
June 15th, 1995
Page 1398
Clerk Of The House Mr. David Hamilton
See context to find out what was said next.