Mr. Speaker, I would like to speak to the issue on the point of order. It is my view that the guidelines that we have now are not gender-neutral. That is there are primarily focused on the dress that ourselves, the men, are subject to a different standard than the women in the legislature, for instance, there is no mention that there is a requirement to wear ties for the women and what is acceptable and unacceptable dress, so, I believe that the shirt that Mr. Picco has on is acceptable, in my view, because it is neat, it is a shirt that is worn by different nationalities and occupations. People who are in Canada and are shirts worn by people in different occupations. I think he mentioned the clergy. I find that the more flexibility we are given in the dress we wear would allow for still those of us who do not look so tidy with ties on, may find ourselves looking even tidier with the type of shirt that Mr. Picco has occasioned to find himself in this morning.
We find there is no mention on the type of facial expression we should be wearing in this House, and that would seem to be more in need of attention than the type of shirt we put on. Thank you.
--- Laughter.