Mr. Speaker, what I'm saying is that in our elders' facility, for example, it's not just for geriatric care of some patients who can't cook and everything else. In a lot of cases, when elders are living in social housing, as we know and we've found out in this House, they don't pay any rent. There is no rent paid. In a lot of cases, elders don't have housing to be able to go in so they had to go into elders' facilities. Because now they're in an elders' facility, they only get $200 income a month. That's what Mr. Ningark has been saying, that's what I've been saying and I think that's what some of the other Members have been saying. It has nothing to do with the other things.

When an elder is in one of these facilities, Mr. Speaker, it's not just for handicapped or geriatric care of elders, it's also for elders who weren't able to get a social housing unit. Where, if they were in that social housing unit, there would be no rent paid and they would get the full amount and value of their pension. However, because, through no fault of their own in a lot of cases, they've had to go one of these elders' facilities in our region, like Mr. Ningark has said. In that case, the $200 doesn't seem to be enough. That's what we're saying. If that's a misconception on some Members' parts, that's fine. That's why I moved the amendment to actually put in, hopefully, a dollar amount. It's only a recommendation. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.