Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Let me try to answer it this way. Again, I have to step back a little bit and look at previous Legislatures. I think that, as I said in a number of occasions in this House, under the previous regime, where Ms Cournoyea was the Premier at the time. She instituted what she felt was a fairer approach, particularly on the capital spending side, in that the call letters were sent to each municipality in each hamlet council, asking them to prioritize their capital expenditures in consultation with the MLAs. That would then come in and be collated through the Premier's office and the Department of Finance, and it would be brought in to the committees for approval by this Assembly. In a perfect world, I suppose you could wave a magic wand and say there are no inequities in the system. There are always inequities in every system. They are there for a variety of reasons and I am not about to speak as to why there are inequities in my colleague's riding.
A lot of what takes place in terms of capital spending and fairness, is based upon our ability as MLAs to consult with, to act, and to campaign for our needs in the communities. But ultimately, the authority and the mechanism to ensure some semblance of fairness and equity lies here in the House, through the committees, and ultimately, through the approval of the budget. There is no mechanism, per se, where I have the authority, because I do not, to determine whether this constituency gets this and that constituency gets that. It is a series of things and I would suggest to you that, while the system is not perfect, far from it, it certainly is a great deal better than it was in previous regimes. It was brought into place where we sought community participation, MLA's involvement, and ultimately, through the committees and the Ministers by the previous regime and incorporated into our capital planning process with this regime early when we were appointed to Cabinet. Thank you.