Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My question is to the Minister of Finance. I had asked the Minister of Finance yesterday this question, along with a lot of other ones and I do not believe I got an answer to it, so I will try again. On pages 9 and 10 of the Minister's budget address, I noted at the top of page 10 in particular, a comment that, "existing GNWT headquarters staff should have hiring priority on Nunavut positions for which they are qualified." My question to the Minister is directly, should the word "should", have been "must"? In other words, should it have read existing GNWT headquarters staff must have hiring priority on Nunavut positions for which they are qualified? Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Seamus Henry on Question 185-13(4): Hiring Priority For Nunavut Positions
In the Legislative Assembly on January 30th, 1997. See this statement in context.
Question 185-13(4): Hiring Priority For Nunavut Positions
Item 6: Oral Questions
January 29th, 1997
Page 298
Seamus Henry Yellowknife South
See context to find out what was said next.