The Communication Strategy, of course, Madam Chair, is to communicate with the public in the north and to ensure that the message that we need to send to southern Canada is consistent with the policies and philosophies of this government. The general statement would be that. The Communication Strategy, for $166,000 is a mix up between northern and southern contract; a combination of northern companies and southern companies. The southern companies, I will start with them first, are being utilized to get our message more clearly across to southern Canada, for example, issues like the revenue sharing with respect to the diamond issue that we have been discussing for the last two weeks. We need to get a consistent, solid, concise message across to southern Canada. Issues like the Creation of Two Territories. These are the kind of issues that have a two part communications need, one in northern Canada advising the constituents what we are doing; and more importantly in southern Canada, where after all the majority of our money comes from and where there is an inordinate amount of control as to what kind of dollars this government gets. I am told it is approximately in terms of cost that between north and south expenditures, there is about two thirds spent in the north and about a third spent in the south, roughly.
Do we want to be specific as to the kinds of things we are doing? Is that what my honourable colleague wants?