Thank you. Mr. O'Brien, if we are looking at the rules of debate, we have Section 23(i), which imputes false or hidden motives to a Member.
I would like to ask if it is under that point that he is making this point of order? Also, again just under the parliamentary rules and forms by Beauchesne's, it also says that it has been formally ruled by Speakers that statements by Members respecting themselves and particularly within their own knowledge must be accepted.
I must accept Mr. O'Brien's statement. If that is so, then are we looking at a point of order under section 21(i)? I must accept the Member's statement by his saying he did not miss any meetings. But I still did not hear Mr. O'Brien raise on that point of order that Mr. Arlooktoo has, on this point of order imputes false of hidden motives to another Member. I must hear it from the Member. Mr. O'Brien.