Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I think I indicated in my address when I tabled the Creation of Two Territories documents a couple of weeks ago, on the transitional side. I think, you have to define the difference between on the transitional which is one time cost and most of that money is spent by the Interim Commissioner. In fact, all his money has to come from the federal government so there is a sense of security there. I said if you go back to what I said with respect to tabling the document, this government does not have the mandate or the money or the responsibility to expend any major transitional costs to move from one government to two. I want to make that clear. I think that is what Mr. Erasmus needs to hear. That is clear. On the incremental side and on the two new gross expenditure bases, that is where we are on discussion right now with the federal government and with our partners in the process, NTI, Interim Commissioner and the Western Coalition.
I am encouraged with the fact that everybody has been able to stay at the table and the fact that consensus, at least touch wood, to date has been able to be reached. Frankly, and last, there is an adequate level of incremental costs which was recognized in the Nunavut accord where it said, reasonable incremental costs will be applied, when we divide two territories. I believe federal government will ante up. Therefore, the concern Mr. Erasmus has got is will the level of service in the west deteriorate because of the division, I believe should not and will not occur. Thank you.