Thank you, Mr. Chairman. In the tendering process when the results come in, the proponents get the opportunity to look at the creative ways that were used by other tenderers on that. In the RFP that is not available. So the proponent does not have an opportunity to learn how he can improve what he is presenting. He has no feed back. So, there has to be some method developed. I have no doubt that these projects when they are received by the government, they are evaluated and I would like to think that in every case the successful proponent had the best proposal.
I believe that should be able to stand on its own. So once the successful proponent is awarded the contract why can the rest of the proponents not see where they were short so that the next time something like that comes out, they will know where they will have to be more creative? So, what would be wrong in after the contract is awarded, the successful proponent has been identified that all other proponents get an opportunity to look at what was presented? Thank you, Mr. Speaker.