Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, I find it very difficult to follow that reasoning on the privatization. I guess it goes back to the privatization directives of this government because I do not know what the policy is. I cannot

see it, so I do not know how to question it. After saying that, I am not a fan of the privatization scheme of parks because in our area of the world, it would be very difficult to privatize parks when you do not have fences and charge admission and so and so forth, to make them into a viable, money operating source, so I am not in favour. In the Yellowknife area, I could see some of those parks on the Ingraham Trail privatized because it looks like they could have some economic revenue generating capabilities. Continuing on to parks and tourism, I would like to know why it seems, when I look at the capital for the different parks, about 80 percent of park money is being spent around the Yellowknife area and my park in my region has to have several major upgrades. It seems to me there is an uneven distribution of money for park development dedicated to capital. I wonder if that is the case. According to the numbers that is the case, but I wonder if that is a glitch in our system and it will be compensated for next year or is it because our parks have lower priority or something?