Thank you. Oral questions. Supplementary, Mr. Steen.
Debates of Jan. 26th, 1998
Topics
Return To Question 101-13(5): Responsibility For Departmental Performance
Question 101-13(5): Responsibility For Departmental Performance
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 311
The Speaker Samuel Gargan
Supplementary To Question 101-13(5): Responsibility For Departmental Performance
Question 101-13(5): Responsibility For Departmental Performance
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 311

Vince Steen Nunakput
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. So, it would be safe then, Mr. Speaker, to come to the conclusion that Cabinet was, in fact, involved in the decisions to delay any action as far as the Minister of Health, in regard to the Keewatin health problems over the summer?
Supplementary To Question 101-13(5): Responsibility For Departmental Performance
Question 101-13(5): Responsibility For Departmental Performance
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 311
The Speaker Samuel Gargan
Mr. Morin.
Further Return To Question 101-13(5): Responsibility For Departmental Performance
Question 101-13(5): Responsibility For Departmental Performance
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 311
Don Morin Tu Nedhe
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Like I said previously, we do have items on our Cabinet agenda that are open to Cabinet Ministers, as well as myself. If we have any concern with how any Member of Cabinet is handling any issue, whether it be health, economic development, transportation, finance; there is an opportunity to vent, and there is opportunity to raise those concerns in Cabinet. The Member mentions health specifically. I myself, have had personal dealings with Mr. Ng on the whole issue of health in the Keewatin. I feel quite satisfied and he has my full support, as the Premier of the Government of the Northwest Territories on how he handles the situation in the Keewatin.
I believe the health care in the Keewatin is quite adequate and does its purpose. I believe the Minister handled it well and he does have, once again, the full support of myself and his Cabinet colleagues. Thank you.
Further Return To Question 101-13(5): Responsibility For Departmental Performance
Question 101-13(5): Responsibility For Departmental Performance
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 311
The Speaker Samuel Gargan
Oral questions. Supplementary, Mr. Steen.
Supplementary To Question 101-13(5): Responsibility For Departmental Performance
Question 101-13(5): Responsibility For Departmental Performance
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 311

Vince Steen Nunakput
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I could come then to the conclusion that the MLAs for the Keewatin ridings were, in fact, involved in a decision to delay any action on the part of this government to resolve the issues in the Keewatin.
In fact, Mr. Speaker, two MLAs would be part of Cabinet because they are, in fact, MLAs for that particular region. I
wonder, Mr. Speaker, if other Ordinary Members, who have had problems in their particular region, would have opportunity to sit with Cabinet and review whatever decision is possible in order to resolve the issue?
Supplementary To Question 101-13(5): Responsibility For Departmental Performance
Question 101-13(5): Responsibility For Departmental Performance
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 311
The Speaker Samuel Gargan
Mr. Morin.
Further Return To Question 101-13(5): Responsibility For Departmental Performance
Question 101-13(5): Responsibility For Departmental Performance
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 311
Don Morin Tu Nedhe
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. We have always encouraged Ordinary Members to raise issues and raise issues of concern in their riding. That is one of the main reasons we took the door off Cabinet, the entry, the hallway between the Ordinary Members and the Cabinet Members. I, again, will restate that if Members do have concerns in their ridings and they would like those concerns addressed, walk through that door, knock on any Cabinet Minister's door and they will meet with you and discuss those issues. That is what they are there for. They will try to help you solve them. Thank you.
Further Return To Question 101-13(5): Responsibility For Departmental Performance
Question 101-13(5): Responsibility For Departmental Performance
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 311
The Speaker Samuel Gargan
Thank you. Oral questions. Final supplementary, Mr. Steen.
Supplementary To Question 101-13(5): Responsibility For Departmental Performance
Question 101-13(5): Responsibility For Departmental Performance
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 311

Vince Steen Nunakput
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, when the House is sitting, it would be quite convenient for Members to raise issues in their ridings. What I am referring to, in particular, would be times like in the summer, when the House is not sitting and critical situations are arising in the areas or regions and Cabinet, through the Minister, has an opportunity to meet and assist the Minister to resolve the issue. What my question is, is would Ordinary Members have an opportunity? For instance, as an example, the Keewatin region health problem. Mr. O'Brien, would he have an opportunity to sit in on Cabinet, while Cabinet is discussing a solution to the issue? Thank you.
Supplementary To Question 101-13(5): Responsibility For Departmental Performance
Question 101-13(5): Responsibility For Departmental Performance
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 311
The Speaker Samuel Gargan
Mr. Morin.
Further Return To Question 101-13(5): Responsibility For Departmental Performance
Question 101-13(5): Responsibility For Departmental Performance
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 311
Don Morin Tu Nedhe
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. No, Mr. O'Brien would not have the opportunity to attend a Cabinet meeting. He would have the opportunity to pick up a phone and phone the Minister of Health, or myself, or any other Minister in this government to relay his concern to the government. So, then we, as government Ministers, whomever he may be talking to - or yourself if you have an issue in your riding - would bring forward your concerns in Cabinet. Thank you.
Further Return To Question 101-13(5): Responsibility For Departmental Performance
Question 101-13(5): Responsibility For Departmental Performance
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 311
The Speaker Samuel Gargan
Oral questions. Mr. Erasmus.
Question 102-13(5): Timeframe For Pay Equity Resolution
Item 6: Oral Questions
January 25th, 1998
Page 311
Roy Erasmus Yellowknife North
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My questions are for the Minister of Finance and the subject matter is the Grand Canyon or better known as pay equity.
Mr. Speaker, I have never seen the Grand Canyon, but I understand it is pretty wide and it is pretty deep. Considering the fact the two positions on the pay equity issue seem to be fairly wide and mediation has fallen apart; is there a new timeframe that we are looking at now? When do we anticipate this may be concluded?
Question 102-13(5): Timeframe For Pay Equity Resolution
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 311
The Speaker Samuel Gargan
The Minister of Finance, Mr. Todd.
Return To Question 102-13(5): Timeframe For Pay Equity Resolution
Question 102-13(5): Timeframe For Pay Equity Resolution
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 311
John Todd Keewatin Central
Yes, well let us be clear, Mr. Speaker. I indicated the Grand Canyon on a serious note to give some reference to the Members of how far apart we are in relationship to the numbers. I cannot speak to the numbers
publicly when we are in negotiations. I was never more serious in my life by saying that to illustrate how far apart the parties are. As I said to an earlier question, I am confident and I am optimistic we will get back to the table on February 2nd, for the second round. Hopefully, at the end of the day, we will be able to look at each other's positions and see if there is a meeting of the minds and see if we could come to - what I have said before and I will continue to say - negotiate an affordable settlement. If there is not, the ramifications are significant.
Return To Question 102-13(5): Timeframe For Pay Equity Resolution
Question 102-13(5): Timeframe For Pay Equity Resolution
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 312
The Speaker Samuel Gargan
Thank you. Oral questions. Supplementary, Mr. Erasmus.
Supplementary To Question 102-13(5): Timeframe For Pay Equity Resolution
Question 102-13(5): Timeframe For Pay Equity Resolution
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 312
Roy Erasmus Yellowknife North
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Last week, Mr. Henry identified the fact that many of the people involved in this particular issue no longer live in the north. Is that one of the stumbling blocks that is holding things up here?
Supplementary To Question 102-13(5): Timeframe For Pay Equity Resolution
Question 102-13(5): Timeframe For Pay Equity Resolution
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 312
The Speaker Samuel Gargan
Mr. Todd.
Further Return To Question 102-13(5): Timeframe For Pay Equity Resolution
Question 102-13(5): Timeframe For Pay Equity Resolution
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 312
John Todd Keewatin Central
It would be fair to say that retroactivity is an issue. In response to Mr. Henry's comment, I believe he asked to what degree are people no longer with this government living in the south. I, at the time, indicated to him I thought it was substantial. I am working on that right now to be able to demonstrate to this House and to the public at large just how substantial it is. Thank you.
Further Return To Question 102-13(5): Timeframe For Pay Equity Resolution
Question 102-13(5): Timeframe For Pay Equity Resolution
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 312
The Speaker Samuel Gargan
Oral questions. Supplementary, Mr. Erasmus.
Supplementary To Question 102-13(5): Timeframe For Pay Equity Resolution
Question 102-13(5): Timeframe For Pay Equity Resolution
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 312
Roy Erasmus Yellowknife North
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Could the Minister indicate what timeframe he thinks it will take before we have this information, which he so graciously has indicated he will put before the House?
Supplementary To Question 102-13(5): Timeframe For Pay Equity Resolution
Question 102-13(5): Timeframe For Pay Equity Resolution
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 312
The Speaker Samuel Gargan
Mr. Todd.
Further Return To Question 102-13(5): Timeframe For Pay Equity Resolution
Question 102-13(5): Timeframe For Pay Equity Resolution
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 312
John Todd Keewatin Central
I would be reluctant to put a time line on it right now, Mr. Speaker, given that we are trying to get back to the bargaining table. We are putting our position forward. As I said, I do not want to circumvent the negotiating process. I just want to be clear on what this government's position is, very clear, and an affordable song is the only way to go. Thank you.
Further Return To Question 102-13(5): Timeframe For Pay Equity Resolution
Question 102-13(5): Timeframe For Pay Equity Resolution
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 312
The Speaker Samuel Gargan
Thank you. Oral questions. Final supplementary, Mr. Erasmus.