Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I have two responses to my colleague's question. On the nurses
situation, I concur there is a problem there. The nurse's are slightly different because some of them are living in the nurses station and my honourable colleague, Mr. Ng, reconfirmed what he was already doing, and that was trying to take a hard look at the compensation package for nurses in which the cost of accommodation is a factor. I believe, he has indicated that he would have something ready by the middle of February, I think, was the deadline. I think that it is important we set some deadlines. I believe, hopefully, on that side of it, we can bring some resolve and some relief to the professionals that we desperately need and some of the difficulties that my honourable colleague has alluded to on a number of occasions in the House, with respect to the medical health staff.
On the rest of the staff, actually, the $40 to $50 million EDAP Program is targeting not only to people in social housing who can afford to have a mortgage, but it would also target some of our staff that rent private accommodations or are in leased accommodation. We hope that this initiative will encourage, if you want, more private homeownership and, at the end of the day, provide them with an opportunity to own their home and afford, I guess, what I would call a mortgage that does not overburden their fiscal condition. That is kind of where we are hoping to go with it. There may still be some people that slip through the cracks, I do not know. Certainly, it is the intent of EDAP and the intent of my colleague, Mr. Ng, on the health stuff. Thank you.