Well you know in corporate terms they call it return on investment. I think an easy example or classic example of where I think we have done it reasonably well is in the employment strategy. Where my memory serves me correctly, I believe Mr. Kakfwi was able to demonstrate that he had created with $9.4 million that we gave them, that they were able to leave of that $34 million of activity that created
the equivalent of 1,200 full-time jobs. The return on investment there we were able to quantify that. That is the quantifier that we are looking for. You cannot always get it in government but that is what we are looking for. I think that is an easy one, but there are more complicated ones. On the accountability side, clearly this Assembly and previous ones and certainly this one has made it clear to us and to myself as Finance Minister that there has to be more transparency on how we spend our money and what return we get on it and be accountable for it. We are trying to move toward getting our public accounts out earlier. We are trying to show in some kind of detail form the results of some our programs that were successes. We are releasing the business plans. We are publishing the contract report. That type of report that the public has access to it.
Where possible this government is going to be so transparent that you will be able to see from one end of it to the other. Really that is what the accountability component of it means. Despite what some people may say, we have come a long way in the last two years in terms of what we provide this House and what we provide the public in terms of how the government spends its money, et cetera. We still have got a ways to go, but we are certainly are heading in that mode. We have nothing to hide. It is just the question of can we get the administrative procedures in place to provide that to you. Those are the kinds of things I mean by accountability and by return on investment. I hope I have answered the question.