Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My questions today I would like to direct to the Premier. I am not sure if it is appropriate because it has to do with the Lahm Ridge Tower leasing. I feel that Mr. Antoine, this was not his portfolio at the time these things occurred, but I will leave that up to the Premier. Mr. Speaker, in the document that was tabled in the House yesterday regarding the Lahm Ridge Tower, a portion of it states, and I quote "It was understood by Public Works and Services that the owner was attempting to negotiate the sale of the building to a northern company. It was understood that Public Works and Services would accept an assignment of the extended lease following the sale of the building if it were possible to negotiate agreeable extension terms". What I would like to know is, the senior people in the Department of Public Works and Services who agreed and negotiated this extension, were they aware of who the potential purchasers of the building were at the time of this negotiation? Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Jane Groenewegen on Question 149-13(5): Lahm Ridge Tower Lease Agreement
In the Legislative Assembly on January 29th, 1998. See this statement in context.
Question 149-13(5): Lahm Ridge Tower Lease Agreement
Item 6: Oral Questions
January 28th, 1998
Page 417
See context to find out what was said next.