This is page numbers 801 - 846 of the Hansard for the 13th Assembly, 5th Session. The original version can be accessed on the Legislative Assembly's website or by contacting the Legislative Assembly Library. The word of the day was chairman.

Topics

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 835

The Chair John Ningark

Thank you. Mr. Minister.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 835

Jim Antoine Nahendeh

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The deputy ministers projected the staff's needs for both departments beyond division. It was well known what was required and how much space was required by the two departments. Thank you.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 835

The Chair John Ningark

Thank you. Mr. Steen.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 835

Vince Steen

Vince Steen Nunakput

What about the Finance Minister, was he involved?

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 835

The Chair John Ningark

Thank you, Mr. Minister.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 835

Jim Antoine Nahendeh

Mr. Chairman, the Financial Management Board Secretariat was informed of this decision to renegotiate this lease of the Lahm Ridge Tower. I am not aware that the Finance Minister was aware of this. Perhaps his secretary, Lew Voytilla was informed of this. Thank you.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 835

The Chair John Ningark

Thank you. Mr. Steen.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 835

Vince Steen

Vince Steen Nunakput

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Obviously, we are understanding here that it was at deputy minister levels, but at some point it was brought to Cabinet for approval. Is that correct?

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 835

The Chair John Ningark

Thank you. Mr. Minister.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 835

Jim Antoine Nahendeh

No, it was not brought to Cabinet for decision. Since it was an extension of an existing lease, it is under the full authority of the deputy ministers. In this case, it was the deputy minister of Public Works, to approve the extension. Thank you.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 835

The Chair John Ningark

Thank you. Mr. Steen.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 835

Vince Steen

Vince Steen Nunakput

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I understand Cabinet was not involved. My other question is in regard to the urgency of signing this lease. Considering the department was in the process of reviewing office space requirements, what was the urgency of signing the lease at that time?

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

February 16th, 1998

Page 835

The Chair John Ningark

Thank you. Mr. Lovely.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 836

Lovely

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The urgency in terms of extending the lease was really on the part of the owner. He was looking to find a way to make his building an attractive investment for a potential buyer. We knew that was the case and we were prepared to talk with him about extending the lease if he could make it financially worthwhile for us to do so. On that basis we sat down with him and it was not difficult within a period of a couple of days to come up with the details of the renewed lease. I should make it clear that when we entered into that, when we gave the commitment to the owner, Mr. Marceau, through a letter of intent, we signed a document which committed us to this arrangement. This would allow the owner to get a new mortgage to, perhaps, attract investors. Even though we had not signed the lease extension, we were still legally committed to the extension at that point, which, I believe, was the end of July, 1997. Thank you.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 836

The Chair John Ningark

Thank you. Mr. Steen.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 836

Vince Steen

Vince Steen Nunakput

Mr. Chairman, I do not quite get the thought plan. For instance, the deputy ministers are only involved at the point where the deal is struck. The deputy minister signs off, but then on the office space plan, it needs the decision of Cabinet. Now why would you need a decision of Cabinet for an office space plan, if a decision of Cabinet is not required to sign the lease?

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 836

The Chair John Ningark

Thank you. Mr. Lovely.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 836

Lovely

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. When the Department of Public Works brought the recommendations to Cabinet for the Yellowknife office space plan, we did not come forward with a proposal which outlined the exact details of everything that was going to happen. We needed approval in some very specific instances for some components of it. We indicated we wanted to extend some beneficial leases. That was one component of the plan, but was not something that required Cabinet approval. That was within the authority of the deputy minister to make those arrangements. However, we did require Cabinet approval to sell the Laing Building as one component of the office space plan. We made other recommendations to Cabinet and FMB for options that would have required their approval. Although the extension of some of the existing leases was not something we required their approval on, it was something we made them aware of, by indicating that is how we plan to deal with satisfying some of our long-term space needs. It was completely within the authority of the deputy to sign the lease extensions without necessarily going to Cabinet.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 836

The Chair John Ningark

Mr. Steen.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 836

Vince Steen

Vince Steen Nunakput

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I understand that Cabinet's decision was not required, even though this was a negotiated extension to a lease. I understand that any negotiated contracts of CAP have to have approval of Cabinet. I do not understand what the difference between this negotiated contract, lease or whatever you want to call it, and an ordinary negotiated contract. Both seem to require a decision of Cabinet. Why would a Cabinet decision be involved in the case of a negotiated contract which may not be $8 or $10 million, may only be $250,000 or whatever; why would their authority be required and a negotiated lease of this size, there is no approval required?

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 836

The Chair John Ningark

Thank you. Mr. Minister.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 836

Jim Antoine Nahendeh

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, again, this lease arrangement has some history. Originally, it went through public tender to get the initial lease with the Lahm Ridge Investment Company, the former owners. After ten years was up, the provisions called for extensions. Even though it was on holdover, it was still a lease extension so it is under the authority of the deputy minister. He could go ahead and renegotiate a better deal for the government. If the lease had ended and we were to go for a totally new package with them, then it would have had to be approved by Cabinet. I understand that is the difference.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 836

The Chair John Ningark

Thank you. We are considering asset management. Mr. Steen, your time is up. On the list I have Mr. Ootes and Mr. Krutko. Mr. Ootes.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 836

Jake Ootes

Jake Ootes Yellowknife Centre

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. On January 28th, the Minister, I believe, tabled a document regarding the scenario, date and times with what happened regarding Lahm Ridge Tower. On July 29th, the owner phoned Public Works, they met on July 30th and on August 1st, the owner wrote PWS, agreeing to general terms. On August 6th, PWS sent a letter outlining details under which the government would be prepared to extend the lease. Then, eight days later, the Executive Council grants approval in principle to the Yellowknife office plan. There is a 14-day period here. My question would be, what was the big rush? Why did the deputy minister take this action so fast? It could have waited. There was no reason. This gentleman phoned and the deputy minister stated before or the minister did, that they had no contact from the owner before July 29th. What all of a sudden is the panic for this, when we are considering the whole office plan situation in Yellowknife? Within a six-day period they sign off this lease and yet, the office plan, which has to take into consideration all sorts of political implications by doing that. There are other business people in this community with tremendous investment and yet, boom, just like that, a lease is signed on the basis, before it was a case where, and I stand to be corrected on this, but my understanding was, there was no desire to renew the lease because it was a southern owner. All of a sudden, there is potential for northern owners, and the lease is signed. Perhaps I can get the Minister to address a little more on the timeframe, why was the urgency here to sign this lease in this short timeframe?

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 836

The Chair John Ningark

Thank you. Mr. Minister.