I do not quite understand the preamble of my honourable colleague. She makes some reference to some things I said, I do not remember saying anything that she indicated I did. Let us clear that up, first of all. Secondly, I really was looking at this economic strategy as a return on investment. What is it going to cost us to get the kind of return we want? In this strategy when we lay it out to you, and it is not quite ready yet, but when we lay it out to you, we will demonstrate, clearly demonstrate. Some people will look beyond tomorrow, but what we are building is a case for the future. What we are building is a case for more money to enable us to do the kinds of things our constituents expect us to do. Sometimes you have to spend money on the front end to ensure at the end of the day you get more money on the back end.
If my honourable colleague would be just a little patient, I think we will be able to demonstrate in the coming weeks, that the investment we are putting in on the front end, will bring us significant return on the back end, when we explain it in detail to the Caucus, to the public at large and by the way, to the groups I have been speaking to over the last three or four months. Just let me, if I may, for the moment, explain who I have been talking to. I spoke to a number of aboriginal leaders, Ms. Cournoyea, Mr. Beaulieu, Mr. Gaudet, Mr. Hagen, Chamber of Mines, Chamber of Commerce, City Hall, Interim Commissioner, et cetera. During the summer, when I was actively, discussing these things, we did in fact look for public input into where we were going. The net effect of what we are trying to do is get a return on investment now for future generations. Thank you.