Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I will endeavour to get to my colleague as I did the other day, as quickly as possible, the answer to the question she raised and I could not answer the other day as quickly as I can. I am really confused. I think what my colleague is saying is the strategy we are putting in place and the monies we are spending, which I disagree with her on, I think it is money well spent, is that expenditure critical to get into the tax window and to get into some of these other initiatives. I think that is what being said. I believe it is, Mr. Speaker.

We have simply got to build the case and document and coordinate an overall approach to the federal government. It is no different than spending $2 million on a road strategy. Mr. Antoine simply has got to take a look at the technical aspects of it, the feasibility aspects of it, the political aspect of it, et cetera. It is no different than what we are doing here.

With all due respect to my colleague, I disagree. I think this money is well spent. From what I have seen so far, in my discussions with the public and the response I had, as early as today, the numerous phone calls I have got, there seems to be support for it and it is money being well spent. Now I hope I have been able to answer the question. Thank you.

Thank you. Supplementary, Mrs. Groenewegen.

Thank you. Mr. Todd.

Mr. Speaker, I am extremely reluctant, as everybody knows in this House, to take questions as notice, but I better take this one as notice and have a discussion with my honourable colleague so I can fully understand what she requires, and be able to provide in the House, exactly what she is requiring because at this stage of the game, with all due respect, I thought I had explained it. So I will take the question as notice.

Thank you. The question has been taken as noticed. Oral questions. Mr. Henry.