Again, we do not have a point of order. The Minister is only responding to what the Member for Tu Nedhe said. You have to be careful when you make reference to imputing a motive. That line with regard to imputing motive or casting aspirations upon any person could be seen if the Member for Tu Nedhe is suggesting that he is paying special attention to his constituency as a Minister. That is imputing a motive. The Minister is only responding to what would be considered, like, if any Member rose on a point, then there might have been imputing a motive here. But the Minister is only responding to what would be considered that motive. Mr. Kakfwi, I know that you were still responding when there was a point of order raised.
Samuel Gargan on Question 136-13(7): Tulita Hotel Project
In the Legislative Assembly on April 27th, 1999. See this statement in context.
Further Return To Question 136-13(7): Tulita Hotel Project
Question 136-13(7): Tulita Hotel Project
Item 6: Oral Questions
April 26th, 1999
Page 365
The Speaker Samuel Gargan
See context to find out what was said next.