Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Based on the premise then that the $30 million one-time capital expenditure for the adult facility makes more economic sense than the $4 million or whatever per year over seven years and doing a piece by piece fix, let us just assume that the adult facility is here and it is going to stay here and that is a more cost-effective way of doing it on a one time as opposed to a spread over several years.

The original young offenders facility was anticipated to be P3 project, which would have not put the same amount of stress on the government's capital budget. That was the whole underlying concept of the P3 was to amortize or spread this over a longer period of time. So, why does the young offenders facility now have to be taken out of the P3 and I am sure it has to represent $5 million or $6 million regardless and put this permanent facility in here when it is still a possibility to locate a P3 project independent from this someplace else. Is the construction of a new adult facility now reliant on this P3 being pulled back and capital funds being spent on this? I am just wanting to get a better understanding of the rationale for this new multi-million dollar megaproject here in Yellowknife.