Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, just looking through this wish list that we received from the Minister regarding deferring different capital items, I happened to come across a line item talking about explanation, the difference between proposed interim appropriation and the December 1999 vision for the five-year capital plan.
Under the Aklavik Foothills Trail, I notice there is $50,000 and it states, "MLA Krutko made a big issue at committee review of not including the project on the interim appropriation." I would like to know, is this note from the deputy minister or the Minister? Who is the one that put this comment in the statement? I do not know what your interpretation of a big issue is.
We are talking $50,000 here and we could not get that out of you. I would like to know what the interpretation of a big issue is and, if this is a public document, which it is now, I take offence to my name being used in this manner. Thank you.