Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Maybe you can take this as a correction. I have heard it from a reliable source that, in fact, deferral was not a highlight of the discussion, and another response to the idea of the project going from a P3 to capital, back to a P3 based costs, is as I see, ludicrous. It went from a P3 process because it was a new way of building facilities in the North that did not demand cash up front for the project. Turning it back to a regular capital process, means that we have to come up with the cash in a one-time, one lump sum. In fact, Mr. Speaker, in the 1999-2000 main estimates, it is listed under Education, Culture and Employment, Aurora Campus facility in Inuvik, estimated completion of occupancy, August 2000, Mr. Speaker. What has happened in a year? Thank you.
Floyd Roland on Oral Question 156-14(2): Aurora Campus Project Deferral
In the Legislative Assembly on March 29th, 2000. See this statement in context.
Supplementary To Question 156-14(2): Aurora Campus Project Deferral
Oral Question 156-14(2): Aurora Campus Project Deferral
Item 6: Oral Questions
March 28th, 2000
Page 402
See context to find out what was said next.