Mr. Chairman, I will respond very quickly. I did not really hear a question there. I think it was a statement, several statements. With regard to the positions, we are still holding firmly in our argument that those should be in the North.
With devolution, yes, we want to move. I think the issue of how does this government move forward on the broad issue of devolution is one that is certainly bigger than RWED. I think it is something that we all have to take a look at. I agree that if we do not make some progress in the short term, in the next six months as Mr. Krutko says, then we are probably going to have a pretty steep hill to climb from here on in this Assembly.
Yes, we are a signatory on the land claims agreements, but there is not really a lot that we can do unless the federal government comes onside. We are just one party that has signed along only really on the areas we have responsibility. The overall agreement is more between the aboriginal beneficiaries and the federal government.
In terms of doing regulations now, I think our plan has been to wait until we have a signal, some basic principals in place, some time frame and then get on with regulations on oil and gas to show that we are serious. I really hope we can get an Alberta-type agreement, but every signal I am getting from Ottawa is that there will never be another Alberta agreement. Whatever it is, it is going to be much less than what Alberta has received.
The advice of moving the Alberta boundary north, that could be ground for a lot of debate. Thank you.