Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I realize that the local people are used to do a forest inventory assessment. On the environmental baseline and the analysis of that study, if we are going to have to wait for development we might be waiting for a while and if it is going to happen that is going to be a component.
I was hoping that the department might be a little bit more proactive, especially in light of the fact that there was a project there already, Mr. Chairman. Maybe I should ask the department if an environmental assessment has ever been done post-Pine Point, post-mine. That is one area. The other area that I wanted to cover with the Minister today is the area of responsibility of the department, whether it is perceived or real. We have industry coming to the Northwest Territories on a regular basis. Industry is no different than government in a lot of ways. They do try to get the best deals they can. That is human nature and the nature of business.
When it is time to deal with First Nation organizations, unfortunately sometimes the divide and conquer method is utilized. When you have an organization such as the Akaitcho who is playing an integral role in devolution of the Northwest Territories and their participation is necessary in the discussion at the Intergovernmental Forum level towards devolution, towards revenue sharing - in fact towards provincehood - the Government of the Northwest Territories should play more of a monitoring and advocacy role on behalf of First Nations who are negotiating with industry. Whether it is Paramount Resources, whether it is Diavik or whether it is De Beers, it should not be left up to them entirely to decide who they can and who they will negotiate with on these impact benefit agreements and participation agreements.
This is something that was forced upon these aboriginal organizations by the federal government and this government with a three-month deadline to negotiate, which is the BHP IBA. There is a lot more riding on the responsibility of the department than would be seen if we just look at the surface.
On the area of traditional knowledge studies and how the studies are done, I would like to ask the department if they have a policy on how traditional knowledge information is gathered. There are some questions. People have been asked a few questions on the streets here and there. They have been asked ten questions and that is supposed to be a traditional knowledge study. That has been said in the past. I would like to know from the Minister if there is a policy.
On the issue of the role of the department in monitoring the Mackenzie Valley Business Management Act, the people that I represent feel it is an imposition on them. It is an agreement between the settled land claims and the federal government and this government. There is a federal lawsuit by a land claim organization for the federal government to establish Mackenzie data. The Akaitcho, the Deh Cho, the South Slave Metis and the Dogrib are part of the process in a very limited way. They are not voting members. The beneficiaries of any development in the Northwest Territories are those with settled land claims, so it is to their benefit to agree to development outside their land claim areas because they do get a percentage of the royalties from there.
If development is going to happen in the traditional territory of a First Nation, they do not even have the power to intervene, whereas the governments in their infinite wisdom determine that the mayor and settlement council have that power, even though they do not have any responsibility outside their municipal boundaries. There is confusion there.
Those are some of the concerns that I have and I hope that the Minister will address them. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.