This is page numbers 741 - 776 of the Hansard for the 14th Assembly, 5th Session. The original version can be accessed on the Legislative Assembly's website or by contacting the Legislative Assembly Library. The word of the day was assembly.

Topics

Question 252-14(5): Business Incentive Policy Issues
Item 7: Oral Questions

Page 762

The Speaker

The Speaker Tony Whitford

Thank you, Mr. Delorey. The honourable Minister responsible for the Department of Transportation, Mr. Handley.

Return To Question 252-14(5): Business Incentive Policy Issues
Question 252-14(5): Business Incentive Policy Issues
Item 7: Oral Questions

Page 762

Joe Handley

Joe Handley Weledeh

Mr. Speaker, I think the question was, if I understood it correctly, who is eligible for consideration for the local priority. Mr. Speaker, if that is the question, under the BIP policy, there is a provision for a local status. Any company that is doing business within the municipality where they register for local status would then be eligible for projects that are connected to that municipality.

For example, if a company is doing business in Enterprise and there is a road repair through Transportation that borders on or goes through the Enterprise municipality, then the company would be eligible. In order to be eligible, they have to be doing business in that jurisdiction.

There is a registry that is kept by the BIP office in RWED. Companies fill out the application form. If that is accepted, then they are included on the registry. That registry is available through a BIP web page and registry. Thank you.

Return To Question 252-14(5): Business Incentive Policy Issues
Question 252-14(5): Business Incentive Policy Issues
Item 7: Oral Questions

Page 762

The Speaker

The Speaker Tony Whitford

Thank you, Mr. Minister. Supplementary, Mr. Delorey.

Supplementary To Question 252-14(5): Business Incentive Policy Issues
Question 252-14(5): Business Incentive Policy Issues
Item 7: Oral Questions

Page 762

Paul Delorey

Paul Delorey Hay River North

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I am referring more to projects on the highway outside of communities. Where are the boundaries that establish what companies can bid on those projects? If the work is outside of the communities or outside of town, where are the boundaries?

Supplementary To Question 252-14(5): Business Incentive Policy Issues
Question 252-14(5): Business Incentive Policy Issues
Item 7: Oral Questions

Page 762

The Speaker

The Speaker Tony Whitford

Thank you, Mr. Delorey. The honourable Minister responsible for the Department of Transportation, Mr. Handley.

Further Return To Question 252-14(5): Business Incentive Policy Issues
Question 252-14(5): Business Incentive Policy Issues
Item 7: Oral Questions

Page 763

Joe Handley

Joe Handley Weledeh

Mr. Speaker, of course in the Territories, any business anywhere in the Territories is eligible to bid on projects. Whether or not they would get the local status would be determined by the way they had filed their application with the BIP registry.

If there is a road repair that does not border on any municipality, then no one would be eligible for the local registry. If they are a bona fide northern company registered that way, then they would get the northern BIP preference.

Further Return To Question 252-14(5): Business Incentive Policy Issues
Question 252-14(5): Business Incentive Policy Issues
Item 7: Oral Questions

Page 763

The Speaker

The Speaker Tony Whitford

Thank you, Mr. Minister. Supplementary, Mr. Delorey.

Supplementary To Question 252-14(5): Business Incentive Policy Issues
Question 252-14(5): Business Incentive Policy Issues
Item 7: Oral Questions

Page 763

Paul Delorey

Paul Delorey Hay River North

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, seeing as the Minister used Enterprise as an example, I would like to ask the Minister, can he see a situation where a project is put out to tender starting in Enterprise and going anywhere from Enterprise, and having two companies identified as local on that, one being Enterprise and one being Fort Providence, but Hay River is not local on that contract? Can he see that situation happening, and would there be a problem with that? Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Supplementary To Question 252-14(5): Business Incentive Policy Issues
Question 252-14(5): Business Incentive Policy Issues
Item 7: Oral Questions

Page 763

The Speaker

The Speaker Tony Whitford

Thank you, Mr. Delorey. The honourable Minister responsible for the Department of Transportation, Mr. Handley.

Further Return To Question 252-14(5): Business Incentive Policy Issues
Question 252-14(5): Business Incentive Policy Issues
Item 7: Oral Questions

Page 763

Joe Handley

Joe Handley Weledeh

Mr. Speaker, theoretically, yes. If a project bordered on or passed through both municipalities of Enterprise and Fort Providence, to follow the Member's example, then you could have two companies, one from Enterprise and one from Fort Providence, which would both qualify for local priority.

If that project was not adjacent to or through the Hay River or municipal boundaries, then the Hay River communities would not be considered as local under the terms of the BIP policy, as I understand it. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Further Return To Question 252-14(5): Business Incentive Policy Issues
Question 252-14(5): Business Incentive Policy Issues
Item 7: Oral Questions

Page 763

The Speaker

The Speaker Tony Whitford

Thank you, Mr. Minister. Final supplementary, Mr. Delorey.

Supplementary To Question 252-14(5): Business Incentive Policy Issues
Question 252-14(5): Business Incentive Policy Issues
Item 7: Oral Questions

Page 763

Paul Delorey

Paul Delorey Hay River North

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. It is a tough time getting the answers on this one. Mr. Speaker, if the project starts in one community but does not border either one of them -- I am talking about proximity to the job. Can you see that? If it is only going through one and not the other, then how can it be Enterprise and Fort Providence but not Hay River? Let us say Hay River is closer to the job site than Fort Providence is. How can Fort Providence and Enterprise be eligible but not Hay River?

Supplementary To Question 252-14(5): Business Incentive Policy Issues
Question 252-14(5): Business Incentive Policy Issues
Item 7: Oral Questions

Page 763

The Speaker

The Speaker Tony Whitford

Thank you, Mr. Delorey. The honourable Minister responsible for the Department of Transportation, Mr. Handley.

Further Return To Question 252-14(5): Business Incentive Policy Issues
Question 252-14(5): Business Incentive Policy Issues
Item 7: Oral Questions

Page 763

Joe Handley

Joe Handley Weledeh

Mr. Speaker, as I understand the BIP policy, and this is really within the Department of RWED, but a business that is located in a community that is in the area but not adjacent to the project, or the project is not within their boundaries, would not necessarily be considered for local preference.

Hay River could be ten kilometres away from a project, but if the project is not adjacent to it or in the boundaries, then the businesses in that community would not be eligible. How close they are really does not have a bearing under the current BIP policy. Thank you.

Further Return To Question 252-14(5): Business Incentive Policy Issues
Question 252-14(5): Business Incentive Policy Issues
Item 7: Oral Questions

Page 763

The Speaker

The Speaker Tony Whitford

Thank you, Mr. Minister. Item 7, oral questions. The honourable Member for Tu Nedhe, Mr. Nitah.

Question 253-14(5): Forest Fire Management Policy
Item 7: Oral Questions

June 12th, 2002

Page 763

Steven Nitah Tu Nedhe

Mahsi cho, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, my question today is for the Minister of Resources, Wildlife and Economic Development, Mr. Antoine, relating to his responsibility over forest fires. Mr. Speaker, it is that time of year when we see forest fires and start to smell it in the air.

I would like to ask the Minister, has the value the department uses to action forest fires changed since last year? Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Question 253-14(5): Forest Fire Management Policy
Item 7: Oral Questions

Page 763

The Speaker

The Speaker Tony Whitford

Thank you, Mr. Nitah. The honourable Minister responsible for the Department of Resources, Wildlife and Economic Development, Mr. Antoine.

Return To Question 253-14(5): Forest Fire Management Policy
Question 253-14(5): Forest Fire Management Policy
Item 7: Oral Questions

Page 763

Jim Antoine Nahendeh

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. As far as I know, the way the forest fire management has been done by the department is going to be continued the same way they did it last year. Thank you.

Return To Question 253-14(5): Forest Fire Management Policy
Question 253-14(5): Forest Fire Management Policy
Item 7: Oral Questions

Page 763

The Speaker

The Speaker Tony Whitford

Thank you, Mr. Minister. Supplementary, Mr. Nitah.

Supplementary To Question 253-14(5): Forest Fire Management Policy
Question 253-14(5): Forest Fire Management Policy
Item 7: Oral Questions

Page 763

Steven Nitah Tu Nedhe

Thank you, Mr. Speaker, and I thank the Minister for his response. I believe the value system they use is only if a community or a cabin or a man-made infrastructure is threatened, only then will the department action that fire.

I ask the question, how do we come up with a value system where we protect the small cabin in the middle of the forest that is going to be burnt? What is the value of the cabin then, Mr. Speaker? If you cannot use the land around your cabin, for which you built the cabin in the first place, it is not usable anymore as you cannot trap or hunt. What is the value? Why do you not just let the cabin burn so the trapper can get compensated and build in another place?

I ask the Minister, was there any consultation done with trappers and people in the communities when they came up with this value system that determines which fires they will action and which fires they will not action? Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Supplementary To Question 253-14(5): Forest Fire Management Policy
Question 253-14(5): Forest Fire Management Policy
Item 7: Oral Questions

Page 764

The Speaker

The Speaker Tony Whitford

Thank you, Mr. Nitah. The honourable Minister responsible for the Department of Resources, Wildlife and Economic Development, Mr. Antoine.

Further Return To Question 253-14(5): Forest Fire Management Policy
Question 253-14(5): Forest Fire Management Policy
Item 7: Oral Questions

Page 764

Jim Antoine Nahendeh

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, in terms of fire management, it has evolved over a number of years since that was devolved from the federal government to the Northwest Territories. During the transfer, the communities and the different aboriginal leaders were quite involved in the whole transfer of that program from being a federal program to the Northwest Territories.

Over the years, the whole Fire Management Program has evolved. It included a lot of consultation with the communities. I think this consultation process should continue on. As you know, we do not know how the forest fire season is going to be yet. We have a few fires already in the North and we have been lucky enough to put them out fairly quickly.

Hopefully through the summer, we will be able to continue that and we do not have to get into a scenario where huge areas have to burn because of this type of policy. We have to continue to talk with the communities and if there is a concern about the value that is placed on the forest or the cabins that are out there, then we must look at it.

I do not really agree that we should just let everything burn, even the cabin, because the forest has a habit of regenerating itself over a number of years. An area may burn and we save the cabin, and in about five or six years, as things come back, you still have a cabin. Thank you.

Further Return To Question 253-14(5): Forest Fire Management Policy
Question 253-14(5): Forest Fire Management Policy
Item 7: Oral Questions

Page 764

The Speaker

The Speaker Tony Whitford

Thank you, Mr. Minister. Supplementary, Mr. Nitah.

Supplementary To Question 253-14(5): Forest Fire Management Policy
Question 253-14(5): Forest Fire Management Policy
Item 7: Oral Questions

Page 764

Steven Nitah Tu Nedhe

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I agree with the Minister that I hope we do not see large fires, since we seem to put less value on our forest and our wildlife, Mr. Speaker. We are reviewing draft acts that are looking at species at risk right now. How do we know which species are at risk when we do not even know where they are? How do we know if we are not protecting those species that are at risk if we just allow the forest to be burned?

I would like to ask the Minister, would his department go back to the communities and reassess what is valuable? A trapper for six years waiting for the trap line to come back, what is he going to do? He cannot go to another place because he cannot afford to sell or move.

If he was compensated, maybe he could go down that route. Those are the concerns and the questions that are asked of me by my constituents and Northerners. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Supplementary To Question 253-14(5): Forest Fire Management Policy
Question 253-14(5): Forest Fire Management Policy
Item 7: Oral Questions

Page 764

The Speaker

The Speaker Tony Whitford

Thank you, Mr. Nitah. The honourable Minister responsible for the Department of Resources, Wildlife and Economic Development, Mr. Antoine.