Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I wanted to follow up on something that I didn't have time for the first time around. It has to do with the fact that the 11 positions that were promised of child protection workers as a result of the League of Child Welfare report. Mr. Chairman, I do believe that we remember it very clearly when this government made a commitment, and I recall that there were child protection workers in the gallery and it was, I thought, a pretty strong commitment on the part of this government to follow up on that. My colleague, Mr. Dent, had already mentioned this. I just want to articulate and make it clear for the record that I do not agree with the government withdrawing the commitment and deferring this to next year. I do believe that these child welfare workers and social workers in the city, as well as in the communities, made a very clear case about their workload and the need for having adequate workers there to take care of the case loads. So I do appreciate that the Minister has mentioned that this is deferred for one year and he will bring it back next year, but we're going to be looking at a new Assembly, a new government, and it is very disappointing. I wanted to put that on the record, that I feel very badly that this area has fallen victim to some of the cost cutting measures.
Another thing relating to that that I wanted to speak about is something that is not easy to explain and I don't want to be misunderstood, but there seems to be some sense in the city that there is too much apprehension of children going on. I'll be the first one to support apprehension of children if any child is in danger. It is when the child is in danger and needs protection that that needs to be done. It concerns me a great deal when people speak about whether or not we're doing the right thing by it. At the same time, I have...