Mr. Chairman, just a few comments in response. Yes, we're very limited by capital and that has meant that we haven't been able to do as much as we would like to do. We do look at the Deh Cho Bridge as a good example of how we might be able to afford to take on some of these major capital projects, where there is enough traffic and activity.
We have had some discussions with the people in the Inuvik region on the possibility of a bridge on the Peel River, so we are looking at that as a possibility and doing it similar with what we're doing with the Deh Cho. I don't know how the traffic counts will work out right now, but we assume there will be more activity in the near future.
On capital, it's been hard to come by. We've certainly done all the lobbying we could to get whatever money we could from the federal government. We recently got $20 million through the Corridors for Canada, which is not as much as we wanted but it certainly helps. In addition to that, over the years we have got about another $17 million over the last five years from various federal programs including the winter bridges money, the ACAP money, the SHIP, the Strategic Highway Infrastructure Program, and through NavCan. So we keep pushing away and we do get a fair chunk of money. In total over the last four years, counting the first year of the Corridors for Canada, it's over $21 million; almost $22 million.
On the airports, the airlines no longer are responsible for security. That's through the CATSA, the Canadian Air Transport Security Agency. The extent to which they will put their services into airports is based on their assessment of risk, so it's not going to be something we're directly involved in. Thank you.