Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I don't have a challenge trying to explain this. The capital planning process is very specific about a primary rating criteria, and protection of assets is one of the key ones on there. In Fort Smith, we've got some assets there that the fire marshal has stated that the two units, the Brown House and Green House, have to be renovated or they are going to shut it down. If they shut those units down, we have a housing problem in Fort Smith for our students at the college. That is not a question.
We also addressed the issue in Inuvik. It's not first class accommodation, presumably, but it's accommodation that is there for the next couple of years to be able to address student need in Inuvik. We've worked on that. We have rehabilitated some units there. We can get access to more units if need be. The Yellowknife Campus, Mr. Chair, is a large capital investment that we would have to look at and we could not address that with the kind of money we are using for the renovation projects and the 15 units in Fort Smith. It just won't answer the question in either location, either Inuvik or Yellowknife.
With regard to grade school, we have to look at it in terms of the government-wide infrastructure planning process and the primary rating criteria that's in place and the protection of assets is there. We know that schools are very, very important to us and we also address those as we can. We have a small budget for small school renovations and larger schools and large school additions that all go through the capital planning process. So I think we do have a good system in place. Thank you.