Mr. Chairman, in response to the first question, it's likely that what we will do is identify subject areas where there is a requirement for ongoing retrieval of those documents on a regular and recurring basis. Many of the documents that go out to the records centre are not required on a regular basis, consequently the ability to access them through an electronic system is not as great. So rather than converting all new documents over, my guess is that in the future what we will be doing is identifying blocks of documents, particular types of documents and using a document imaging system for those. For example, the FMBS, when it was dealing with the pay equity dispute, had a large volume of records that were put onto a specific document imaging system, so they could be retrieved during the court proceedings that took place with respect to that issue. They required regular, recurring access to those documents and an electronic system provided that to them. That kind of access isn't normally required for a lot of our documents.
In terms of whether or not we will be doing this as a coordinated-across-government approach, the intention is, yes, we will do that as a coordinated-across-government approach. However, in our preliminary look at it, it does appear that different types of documents require different types of document imaging systems. One single system may not suffice for everything.