Thank you, Madam Chair. I also support the motion. I feel that the process used was not fair to other communities. We identified capital projects, so we could throw the money to something else and I didn't think it's fair. I have had a project in my riding and for $40,000 more I could have had a two-lane bridge. This Minister was involved and he wouldn't transfer $40,000 from anywhere else or even use a supp so we could have a two-lane bridge. It's hard when you aren't a Minister, you can't get anything done but, if you are, you can transfer all the money you want.
This is not the only area I have seen this. I have seen it in other areas where money is being moved without going through corporate planning. If it was so high on the corporate planning priorities, then it should have said so in the letter that was given to us and it wasn't. I think this department, Finance, is going to have to start fixing up how they do things and the Minister is going to have to tighten up on how they do things. Maybe by putting this motion forward, maybe it's the first step to fix up how we do things. Too many things are unclear, too many extraordinary dollars are going to some communities because of poor planning, poor management. We are going to have to change that. I am going to support this motion. I am not going to speak too long on it. We have things to do at quarter to seven. Thank you.