Mr. Chairman, I would like to pursue the line of questioning Mr. Krutko is asking with regard to Tuktoyaktuk and the money that is being allocated for the road and the hamlet. I'm quite concerned. It seems like we have a double standard when it comes to roads in the Minister's riding and roads in the other Members' ridings. I have roads that are of concern in my riding. The community of Fort Providence spent a lot of money out of their own coffers and out of their own general revenues. Although I raised the issue with MACA many times that the road was deteriorated because the stockpile was never replenished because there was nobody in the region to fill the vacant positions, therefore, it never made it on the capital plan because the capital plan was never updated for three years. There were a whole series of events that lead to this. The road started to cave in throughout the community. My request fell on deaf ears. But I see when a road in Tuk has a problem, there is money available.
So I'd like to ask the Minister if he could explain to this House what the criteria is that's used to obtain some money for roads, which may be deemed as emergencies. I know in our case it was an emergency. I've never seen the Tuk road, so I don't know what the condition was. But what is the criteria used to determine who gets on as a special warrant or on the supplementary appropriation?