Thank you, Mr. Speaker. We continue to make the case to our federal counterparts that this is a priority and we believe support for development initiatives up and down the valley will hinge on federal support for PAS. I think that's true. You've seen quite a bit of lobbying from ENGOs who believe the federal government has to do more in this regard. So between ourselves and the ENGOs, we continue to press the case to the federal Ministers responsible that this is indeed a priority and this is something that needs to be addressed right now. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Thank you, Mr. Bell. Supplementary, Mr. Yakeleya.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, can the Minister also ensure that the communities along the route who are looking at the Protected Areas Strategy, the communities that are in the land claims, that are following the land claims agreements in terms of the Protected Areas Strategy? Thank you.

Thank you, Mr. Yakeleya. Mr. Bell.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I hope I got the nature of the question. The PAS is, in fact, grassroots driven. It's really up to communities to identify areas that they think are culturally sensitive or natural or cultural areas that they feel are special and indeed need protection. So we rely on communities to identify those and then the various partners in the PAS all combine to make sure that those areas are, in fact, protected from future development. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Thank you, Mr. Bell. Final supplementary, Mr. Yakeleya.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, the reason why I say this is that the federal government sometimes puts the squeeze on the communities, you know. There's a time frame to do some really decent work in terms of the Protected Areas Strategy. So I'm asking the Minister if he could ensure that the Protected Areas Strategy deserves the quality and the work that it presents itself to the communities. Thank you.

Thank you, Mr. Yakeleya. Mr. Bell.

Mr. Speaker, we will continue to make the case to the federal government that this is a priority for northerners, and we would acknowledge that although there's been a lot of good work done by the partners over the past five years and we're in the fifth year of implementation, we have yet to protect a single area. There are interim areas, there are areas that have been identified for protection, but we haven't, in fact, done this and we see this as, to date, a failing of the work of both our government and the federal government and the ENGOs. So obviously we have to move forward clearly. We have to fund the strategy, the $17.8 million approximately, and make sure that we actually, in fact, start to protect some of these very sensitive, special, natural and cultural areas. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Thank you, Mr. Bell. Item 6, oral questions. The honourable Member for Range Lake, Ms. Lee.

Thank you, Ms. Lee. The Minister responsible for the Housing Corporation, the Honourable Mr. Krutko.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, in regard to the market housing initiative, we are still in the process of implementing that program. We haven't concluded the construction or got all the units occupied. Some are occupied, others are not. Until the whole project is completed, we will be developing a review of the overall project. We will hopefully have that report ready by December, or November at the earliest.

Thank you, Mr. Krutko. Supplementary, Ms. Lee.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. If the Members recall, we had a huge debate in this House in June. There was a lot of urgency there because the corporation felt it needed to meet the barge deadline. Now I'm being told that those units are not in place and this is almost the end of October now. So I'd like to know if the Minister could commit to holding off -- because I think there's a second phase to this program -- any thought of ordering 22 more of them for next year, until this whole thing is revisited. Thank you.

Thank you, Ms. Lee. Mr. Krutko.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, until we complete our review, we can't make that decision outright right now. We will have to do that review before we determine if we're continuing on or not.

Thank you, Mr. Krutko. Supplementary, Ms. Lee.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I don't have it in writing, but I believe the former Minister responsible for the Housing Corporation, Mr. McLeod, almost wrote it in blood that he would not be ordering the 22 new units without a full review of how much of that contract could stay in the North. Could the Minister indicate to me as to whether or not he has the same kind of commitment? Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Thank you, Ms. Lee. Mr. Krutko.

Did what? Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, the whole intent of the review is to take a close look at exactly the overall cost of the project, what the benefits were to the northern economy and also to look at the systems to ensure that if we do continue on that we are able to meet the objectives that were set, which is to look at market housing and provide a needed service for non-market communities. We will have that as part of the report. Thank you.

Thank you, Mr. Krutko. Final supplementary, Ms. Lee.

Just to be clear on the 22 homes that were ordered, could the Minister be more specific about what the problems are? Is it getting the gravel there, or getting the stuff there, or are the people not being able to purchase those homes? Thank you.

Thank you, Ms. Lee. Mr. Krutko.