Thank you. I think one of the benefits of the Arctic Energy Alliance as a not-for-profit society is it has access to federal funding that this government really doesn't. I know we don't have the 2003-04 final numbers in and don't have that accounting yet and I can't provide that to Members as far as all of the programs that have happened, but over the past few years I know that the Arctic Energy Alliance has been successful in working in Tulita, for instance. There it was involved in assisting the staff at the LHO in completing a proposal for energy conservation.
So there have been a lot of small community initiatives. The federal program that allowed cost-shared funding for energy audits, one of the challenges we had was really in order to meet the criteria of the federal funding, only Yellowknife was able to qualify for this funding in the way that it was rolled out. That wasn't acceptable, obviously, to this government. So we worked to add additional money that would allow this program to be expanded into other communities besides Yellowknife. We did that and used the Arctic Energy Alliance as the vehicle and the mechanism for delivering that program. I think many of the federal programs that are out there don't recognize the challenges and the needs of some of the smaller and more remote communities, and the money obviously doesn't go as far when you have to travel to access some of these communities. So that's something this government has recognized, and the Arctic Energy Alliance has helped us sort of expand some of these federal programs that in fact were asking us to put sort of a square peg into a round hole. We've been able to adjust some of the programs to the benefit, I think, of many of the smaller communities.