Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, part of what we are putting forward in this strategy that we have and balancing our budget is increasing our own revenues, taking into the scenario that there is going to be a growth and demand of services. As we argue right now, we are not able to keep up with what we have, we are not able to keep up with the level of capital infrastructure that we should be putting into our communities and replacing existing facilities. We are not able to keep up with that because of our fiscal situation. So we have a long way to go before we can look at sunsetting some of our programs or our tax initiatives. What we put forward, again, based on what we discussed as all new Members when we got here, was $10 million of our own source revenues, $10 million reductions and $30 million from the federal government. We haven't gotten that $30 million from the federal government. What we did was get a one-year break in trying to work out our tax effort. So we still have a problem that is going to hit us in 2005-06 with our expenditure side of the picture versus our revenue side. So we still have to fix that. Future
governments, if things get so good that we become a have-territory, then future governments can as they have in the past reduce some of the tax effort that we have to put in place right now. Thank you.