Thank you, Madam Chair. At one time we were much more involved in a lot of the areas with other departments. Again, as stated, user pay/user saves. There were a lot of areas that were returned to departments and they could choose how to do it. This is one area where there is a fair bit of technical expertise developed, and it was felt that it would remain in house in one department instead of splitting it up, and departments not having the ability and the resources to go to sort of a multi-faceted team that has experience in a number of different kinds of facilities. So the technical expertise was kept in one department and that is the way we have continued to operate on that end. If we looked at going down the other road, the potential is that there could be some higher costs in those areas, as we have seen with some of the other initiatives where each department goes to try to hire its own technical expertise or develop its own systems as well in that area.
I guess one of the other areas I should point out is as the department is involved in helping this process along, there are charges that departments would pay, but that is when the actual contracts are for actual design of a facility. There are those dollars that go to the architects that we would contract with and they would supply actual final drawings. Then contractors that would build a facility could take the drawings and do estimates on providing the level of work it would take, if it be electrical people and plumbers, concrete people or steel people, that would all come from those drawings. So they would end up paying and part of the project would pay for some of those costs. But Public Works and Services is in the front end of planning and preparation, getting the rough estimates, I believe it is close to a class C estimate, and then it goes on from there. Thank you.