Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Those sound like very constructive steps, Mr. Speaker, and I won't press the government on which one or how to go yet. I will be quite happy to leave it for some time, and come back with a thorough recommendation. But I would like to pursue, Mr. Speaker, one aspect of this that I believe deserves some attention and should be considered right out front, and that is the approach of saying that we should have two acts; one to administer the liquor on a business basis, and the mandate of the government's social responsibility. I'm wondering if Mr. Roland would advise us as to whether this approach to creating two acts to manage liquor would be a viable approach that we could consider. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Bill Braden on Question 136-15(3): Liquor Act Review
In the Legislative Assembly on May 26th, 2004. See this statement in context.
Supplementary To Question 136-15(3): Liquor Act Review
Question 136-15(3): Liquor Act Review
Item 6: Oral Questions
May 25th, 2004
Page 544
See context to find out what was said next.