Question is being called. All those in favour? All those opposed? The motion is carried unanimously.

---Carried

At this time, I would like to take a 10-minute break before we carry on with motions.

---SHORT RECESS

Item 16, motions. Mr. Yakeleya.

WHEREAS pursuant to section 61(1) of the Legislative Assembly and Executive Council Act, the Legislative Assembly recommends to the Commissioner the appointment of Members of the Executive Council;

AND WHEREAS pursuant to section 61(2) of the Legislative Assembly and Executive Council Act, the

persons appointed hold office during the pleasure of the Legislative Assembly;

AND WHEREAS the assembly, pursuant to these powers has chosen the Honourable Henry Zoe to sit as a Member of the Executive Council;

NOW THEREFORE I MOVE, seconded by the honourable Member for Hay River South, that this Assembly formally revoke the pleasure of the Assembly from the appointment of the Honourable Henry Zoe as a Member of the Executive Council;

AND FURTHER, that this Assembly recommend that a new Member be chosen to be a Member of the Executive Council.

The motion is in order. To the motion. Ms. Lee.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to speak in support of this motion. Mr. Speaker, I do it with a heavy heart because I am well aware of the personal suffering involved here of our colleague, Mr. Zoe, and his family, his friends, his constituents and his leadership. Mr. Speaker, no matter the outcome of this motion, it is my sincere wish that Mr. Zoe would take necessary decisions and take personal actions to grow positively from this and to achieve personal healing.

For me, Mr. Speaker, my decision on this motion is totally based on the interest of the public that I feel I am here to serve and in my desire and sense of duty to meet the obligations of the people who have put me in this place.

Mr. Speaker, I don't want to make a long statement. This is difficult for all of us. I just wanted to make it clear where I stand on this motion. Mr. Speaker, I can tell you for the interest of the public, because there are questions being asked about what happened. On the basis of what I know from the conversation with the Premier and the briefings he has given to us outside of this House and the answers to the questions that were brought before this House, I do believe there have been actions on the part of Minister Zoe that have brought disrepute and damages to the integrity and the standard of this Assembly that the people have the right to expect from us.

Mr. Speaker, I believe the Minister has engaged in public intoxication, improper conduct towards women, and also abuse of his office in his dealings he said many times, "Do you know who I am? I am a Minister of Cabinet."

Fourth, I do believe he was engaged in discrimination in an identifiable group, of people which we know as racism.

Mr. Speaker, I do understand that the question "Isn't his apology enough?" being asked a lot. Mr. Speaker, I understand that we are not perfect. We all have our shortcomings and we do do things wrong from time to time. But in this case, this is not a personal matter. This is about our public duty to the public and we are held to a higher standard.

I understand MLAs' positions cannot be taken away by anybody else other than the people who have selected him and that's fine. The Premier has exercised his prerogative to remove the portfolios from Mr. Zoe, and he has done that because that's within his power to do so. The only thing that I can do here to show that I cannot accept the conduct of the Minister is to say that Mr. Zoe has lost my confidence that was based on my vote to select him to Cabinet.

Mr. Speaker, I want to state once again that this is not easy for me or anyone else, but I do believe that it is important in the world that we live in and the level of cynicism there is for politicians and the practice and values we preach in this House, which is zero tolerance against abuse of alcohol or zero tolerance against violence against women. I cannot in my heart say that's okay and I will give him another chance, because what will another chance mean?

So, Mr. Speaker, it is the complete and total privilege for one of us to be chosen, not only as a Member of this House by the people, but to have a seat on Cabinet is a complete privilege. It could be taken away at any time. It is a trust that people give us. We have a fiduciary duty for that office and when we miss that, it's not to say that you are a bad person, it's just that we do not have confidence in you anymore as a Minister and we do not have confidence in you to represent us and be the face of this government. It's not the end of the world. As someone said, I do wish Mr. Zoe well. I know it's been very hard. I know he will do the right thing and to move on and get a positive outcome out of this and he will try to find it. I would like to ask for a recorded vote, Mr. Speaker. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I would just like to ask the Members if you could focus your replies to the question at hand and keep it in the context of the motion that is in front of you and don't drift off into hearsay, but keep our discussions to the motion. To the motion. Mr. Menicoche.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I, too, regret that we have to be deliberating the confidence that the House has in Mr. Zoe. There is a motion on the floor, Mr. Speaker. I am going to go on record that I will not be supporting the motion. I have a few reasons that I will be speaking against this motion.

In this great country of ours, we have a due process of law. There are certain allegations being made and to my mind, Mr. Speaker, they are unsubstantiated. I believe that the punishment that's been talked about so far, which is the removal of the portfolios, is adequate for now. I believe there should be no further action with regard to Mr. Zoe until it's fully investigated. In the public eye, the feedback I have been getting, Mr. Speaker, is this happened and the House has decided to do this and it appears to be satisfactory to the people I have been talking with. Mr. Zoe has satisfactorily pleaded in my mind that, yes, he has done this and he will be seeking to correct his behaviour with respect to what has happened in the past. That has happened to many leaders in our North and they have strived and overcome difficulties and became better for it. What had to happen first is they had to have some personal trials and tribulations and then in this case, the whole of the North is watching him. Not just the North, Mr. Speaker, the whole of Canada is aware of what's been happening here in the past week or so.

Just with that, Mr. Speaker, that's where I stand today. Thank you very much.

To the motion. Mr. McLeod.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I, too, have given a considerable amount of thought to this issue, as Members have stated here. It's a difficult one to deal with. It could be so easy to ignore this whole circumstance and not say anything. However, over the weekend, I have had some discussions with my constituents. I have had some calls and e-mails. I have really done some soul searching on this issue. Again, I say it's difficult because it forces us to do a number of things. First if all, it forces us to look internally at our own conduct, look at the circle of friends that we associate with, places we go to and what type of person we are and what type of character we present.

I guess the hardest thing for me is to stand up here and be judge and jury of one of my peers, one of my colleagues. However, when you enter this forum and this level of politics, there is no other place to go for somebody to pass judgment. That judgment has to be made by ourselves.

I want to be clear that I am not condoning or defending Mr. Zoe's actions, but I believe everyone makes mistakes and they can learn by their mistakes. In this case, Mr. Zoe has taken ownership of those actions. He has publicly apologized. He has publicly stood up and asked for forgiveness, and he has also stated that he will take necessary action to turn his life around. That doesn't seem to be enough for many people in this House. Many of us come from similar backgrounds. Many of us come from small communities. Many of us went through the hostel life like Mr. Zoe. All of us have worked hard to get an education. We get a college education and like everyone here, we want to develop a better life for our children and our families. Mr. Zoe was also fortunate to be elected as Minister for the 15th Assembly. However, he also had to move to a larger centre and deal with bigger issues and take on a huge responsibility that comes with being a Minister, the stress level and a real sharp learning curve.

My observation of this whole issue has been that Mr. Zoe, right from the outset of this issue coming forward, has done everything that we've asked him to. We've asked him to come forward and admit that he's made a mistake. We've asked him to apologize. He's done all those things. He's also accepted responsibility for everything that happened. While I support the Premier and Cabinet in terms of their decision to remove Mr. Zoe's portfolio until we can decide what Mr. Zoe's future is going to be, I don't support this motion of non-confidence. I have watched Mr. Zoe. He has worked hard to be a good Minister. He's dedicated. He's sincere. Those qualities can't be ignored. In this House, to all of us, we have programs, we have support systems for people who have drug problems, alcohol problems, family problems, stress, but I don't see that kicking in and working in this case. In fact, I have to ask the question when do those programs kick in, when you hit rock bottom or when you make a mistake?

I am going on five years as a Member of this House and I have never seen those programs come forward to assist anybody that I know of anyway. I am not familiar with anybody who has taken advantage of them. Why do we have them? Is it just window dressing? I am not sure. It's not working in this case.

I believe given the opportunity, Mr. Zoe can clean up problems in his life, some of the things that are affecting his conduct, and he can come back to be a very productive and responsible Minister given the chance. He's also a leader in his own constituency and in the Dogrib nation, and he also has a lot to offer, which we may not see. I am totally convinced if we pass a vote of non-confidence here today that we will be ending Mr. Zoe's career in the public eye.

I kind of wonder why we are not supporting him, why we asked him to do a number of things, and he's done it, and I kind of ask myself, and people have asked me whether he did the right thing by coming forward and being open and being honest and admit that he had done something wrong. Would he have been better off to hire a lawyer and surround himself by advisors, dig in his heals and deny everything that's happened? I don't know. Maybe that's the way to go in this modern day society, is not to admit to anything. I am just wondering what kind of message we are sending out there. I think everybody across the Territories knows by now, it has been in the media what happened with Mr. Zoe at the Legion. I have also heard it on the national news. So it is right across Canada. Some people have decided that we should make an example of Mr. Zoe, and I agree, but I think we should make an example and make it a positive one.

We have to allow people to deal with their personal issues, and come back and take their rightful place in society. I am going to admit -- I'll be honest -- I don't know all the details of what happened that night at the Legion, and I may never know, but I do know that the Legion has publicly stated that they accept his apology. I do know that the elders of the Dogrib nation and the leaders have already stated that they will work with Mr. Zoe in trying to develop a path for him to come and recover, and heal. I do know that his family is standing beside him, and I also believe, and I am sure that all the people that he has offended and embarrassed will also find it in their hearts to forgive him once he has turned his lifestyle around.

Mr. Speaker, this vote is about non-confidence. I can't say I've lost confidence in Mr. Zoe, but I can say Mr. Zoe needs some professional assistance. He needs the help of those people, those elders.

I know he has already paid a huge price. This is one lesson he will never forget. So I want all of us -- and I mean all of us in this House -- to give him a second chance to become healthy, and to prove to us that he is still a worthy candidate to be a Cabinet Minister.

Mr. Speaker, voting yes would have been so simple for me to just agree that we've lost confidence. The difficult choice was to stand up and say that I'm willing to put faith in a fellow colleague, and one that's made a serious mistake, but give him a second chance. That was a whole lot harder, and a whole lot more challenging. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

To the motion. Mr. Villeneuve.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I just wanted to reiterate some of the comments my colleagues were speaking about in regard to Mr. Zoe's actions, and the fact that he did accept the criticism from his peers in the taking away of his portfolios. I think that stands in itself that's enough to discredit Mr. Zoe of what he has done or what he may have not done. I think with his public apology and his promise for restitution and seeking his own healing, that Mr. Zoe is going in the right direction. I have to agree with Mr. McLeod's comments that the

motion is a non-confidence motion, which I myself have not lost in Mr. Zoe yet. I realize that it is our civic duty, it does require Members to be diligent and responsive to public scrutiny or public opinion. I think Mr. Zoe has taken this task very seriously and honestly, and tackled it head on with his responsiveness to all the scrutiny that has been coming about each day. I believe that we all have to uphold zero tolerance with respect to many issues in regard to being a Member in the actions and the opinions that we make in public. I also believe that we should take zero tolerance with regard to any unsubstantiated comments or hearsay as truth as Members, also.

Because I don't support the motion does not mean that I condone Mr. Zoe's actions or comments in the fact that if he violated another person or not, but just to say that as an aboriginal northerner I believe that it is my duty to say that we are faced with the racist comments, actions and just racism in general every day as aboriginal northerners, and I don't think that any of them should be tolerated no matter who these racist connotations are directed towards or to be taken lightly by any Member of the Legislative Assembly. But I have to say that knowing Mr. Zoe for a number of years, that I also think that he has done an exceptional job as a Minister of the Legislative Assembly, and a Member of the Executive Council to date. One such incident shouldn't wholly discredit and make Mr. Zoe feel probably very low and very shamed about what he did. I think that would be punishment enough, Mr. Speaker, and for that matter I am not in support of this motion. Thank you.

To the motion. Mrs. Groenewegen.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I am the seconder to this motion, and obviously I will be supporting this motion. I was hoping that we would avoid a long protracted debate on this subject here in the House today, but it has been spoken to by a number of Members so I feel that I need to speak to it as well. To me this is quite a simple issue. This is not complex. This is not personal, this is business. The people of the Northwest Territories have asked us as elected leaders to provide them with sober leadership. That is a reasonable request on the part of the people of the Northwest Territories. We have not delivered that in this instance. It is just that simple for me. That is a very reasonable expectation of the people we represent, that we would do so in a way that at least we would be sober. So I am dismayed by some of the comments I have heard here today by other Members. The comments about racism, insinuating that if it was somebody other than an aboriginal person who had done this, that we wouldn't have any reaction to it. That is preposterous, and I do not accept that. There is no racism involved here.

Mrs. Groenewegen, could you speak to the motion, not insinuate what somebody said or what not. To the motion.

Mr. Speaker, I am not in a position to police Mr. Zoe's conduct as a Member, to follow him around and see what he is going to do. Yes, there are programs, people need to avail themselves of those programs. But if they don't want to, it is not my job to ensure that they do. To suggest, Mr. Speaker, that Mr. Zoe's political career will be ended by sitting on this side of the House is something else that I reject. What do all of us do here in representation of our constituents if this is not an honourable task to perform on behalf of our constituents? So I will be supporting the motion, Mr. Speaker, and, like I said, it is not personal, it is delivering a minimum standard of conduct for the people of the Northwest Territories. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

To the motion. Mr. Dent.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I have known Mr. Zoe for a while. We served together in the 12th Assembly. Shortly after the election I met with Mr. Zoe, we went for a coffee and talked about our aspirations. He told me at that time that he wanted to be on Cabinet. Mr. Speaker, I told him that things have changed, and that attitudes towards alcohol use had changed significantly, that there was no longer any tolerance for alcohol abuse by Cabinet Members. I told him that I expected to hear from him that he understood that things had changed, and that he could live with these new rules. He told me that day, Mr. Speaker, that he would. I made it clear, Mr. Speaker, what my position would be if he showed that he had a problem with alcohol.

Last week Mr. Zoe admitted that he does have a problem with alcohol. Some people have talked about other things here, but I want to leave it limited to the one issue that Mr. Zoe has talked about. He did admit that he had a problem with alcohol, and that he made unacceptable comments about people from Newfoundland while under the influence of alcohol. So, Mr. Speaker, I warned Mr. Zoe early on what my position would be, and I was clear that he only had one chance in order to prove himself. So I had hoped that we would not get to the situation that we are in today, but, Mr. Speaker, since it has come to pass as a result of a situation that I have warned Mr. Zoe about, I feel that I must support this motion. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

To the motion. Mr. Delorey.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I will try and keep my comments very brief and to the motion. This is a very unfortunate incident that has taken place, but to me it is also a very simple issue that we are dealing with. I look across the Territories and I see every one of us in this House as role models to the Northwest Territories, and especially our youth. I see school policies being set down that are very firm with no second chances involved. You get caught drinking when you are on business and representing a school, and you are suspended. You pay for the crime that you have supposedly committed, and you are dealt with that way. I look at this as nothing personal, strictly a business thing, and I look at any Member across there or here, faced with the same set of circumstances, my values, my principles and what I believe in, and what I think that our job is here in representing the constituents that we do, I would make the same decision that I am making here today. That is I will be supporting this motion. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

To the motion. Mr. Hawkins.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I, as well, had to do a lot of soul searching over this issue, and I thought it would be important for me to speak at least for the record, in all fairness. Therefore, when I vote either way, at least Mr. Zoe would have heard my thoughts.

This has truly been a struggle, as I can't imagine it hasn't been for most Members here. Some are pretty cut and

dry, and others it really takes quite a challenge to deal with.

I will first clearly say to you, Mr. Speaker, that I like Mr. Zoe personally. I think Mr. Zoe is a pretty darn nice man, I think he has worked hard at the Assembly, and this question here has caused a lot of grief in the sense of trying to make a decision over this. But as far as things are going, Mr. Zoe's actions have spoken louder than words, I guess. I really appreciate him going and grabbing hold of the reins of the treatment, but my constituents have asked me to proceed forward, and it is causing me a lot of difficulty, but this job came with a lot of stress in a sense that we had to be prepared to make tough choices; some that we don't even agree with, and some that will bother us for a while. I do respect Mr. Zoe as a person, but unfortunately it has caused me some serious concern in the sense that this has truly been a struggle. So I will have to vote in favour of the motion, and I hope he can respect that and understand maybe someday why I chose that method.

My constituents have come forward to me, they have stopped me on the street, they've told me what they think, they've told me how they feel. One of the biggest outlining factors is that they would like to see, be if fair or not, that there was zero tolerance taken. Is that fair? Maybe in this particular case that may not be fair. We talked about things not being proven, and you know what, I want them to be cleared up. Maybe this isn't the assembly to be doing them in, but unfortunately we are confronted with this decision today. I stress it is with a heavy heart that we have to talk about this. I wish we could have dealt with this and be absolutely clear on every single page on what we are doing, but still we are proceeding without being 100 percent clear. So I must stress that in that respect I am left with little choice.

Do we give Mr. Zoe another chance? Today I would really like to, I really do, and I mean that. It is not easy standing here saying that; I would really like to. I hope we have an opportunity amongst all Members to give Mr. Zoe a fair second chance. I have quite clearly said that at any time if he wishes to call upon me to talk or whatever is needed, I will be there, and I mean that. It took a lot of thought.

Will this divide us? I really hope it doesn't. I know this decision is going to have some ripple effects. Let's be honest; you can't throw a pebble in a pond without creating a ripple, and this is one big pebble. It is going to be one of those situations that we are all going to have to find mutual respect amongst each other and realize that we are here to perform a task. There is nothing more I can truly add. I don't want to get into the nature of the comments. I don't think that is important today. I think what is important today is me at least speaking my views on why I will proceed. It has hurt some of the constituents in my constituency, and I will proceed forward with the utmost respect in this House because I will continue to respect Mr. Zoe as a Member of the Assembly, and he will see that. But unfortunately at this time Executive Council is not where my constituents feel where I can support him in at this time, and I just wanted to be honest and forthright in this Assembly. Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.

To the motion. Mr. Roland.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, as many have said, it would be easy to sit and vote on it when the call for a vote came up. This is something that I go back to before we elected Members to the Executive Council. It is about your word, Mr. Speaker. It is about when we first meet each other around this table, some of us may know a little bit about each other, especially those who have been in this arena before. Others, we come here and all we know is a name or somebody else telling us about an individual. When we cast that vote we hope to have the opportunity to speak to the individual, and try to find out a little bit more about them before we decide if that individual would be a good Cabinet Minister.

Mr. Speaker, I will say publicly that alcoholism is a bad thing in the Northwest Territories. Mr. Zoe has come clean in saying that he has a problem. Mr. Speaker, it was a concern for a number of Members of this Assembly before it came to this situation. Members had asked Mr. Zoe about his situation and if it would impact on his ability to do his job. Members took his word that it would not interfere. Knowing the situation we are in, he's gone a long way to address some of the initial concerns that have come forward, and that is tough to do. Mr. Speaker, some of us in this arena have walked through that door ourselves in the past, and have seen the destructive effects it can have. It is unfortunate that we have to have this here, but nobody else can do this except for us, as Mr. McLeod says. It is difficult, but we are the ones who police ourselves. In this Assembly, in this arena, all we get to come in with and go out with in a sense of integrity is who you are. When you say something, is your word valid? Are you good for what you say? A lot of this is built around that. If Members cannot trust a Minister when he's responding to questions or information being provided and always second guessing and wondering if that is true, that does a lot of damage for our system and the way we operate.

I have only known Mr. Zoe for a short time and again it's one of those things, when you are in the Northwest Territories, it's a small place. You have baggage you have to deal with and you respond to those when questions are put forward to you. Unfortunately, in this situation when the question was put forward, the answer was it's not going to be a problem. Well, six months into it, it is a problem. Mr. Speaker, I can speak from experience because I have walked through that door of having to admit I had a problem and had to just about lose it all to finally wake up and say it is a problem. I can't fix it by tinkering. I have got to fix it by making life choices.

This motion, unfortunately, Mr. Speaker, is one of those events in a person's life where you could hit rock bottom. I hope Mr. Zoe will come out of this and get that help he said he would get. But when I operate, I have to operate upfront. When I meet with individuals, I tell them this is the way I operate.

Mr. Speaker, the motion that is before us, I would have to support. Your word is your word. Let your yes be your yes, and your no be your no. It can't be a maybe, not in this arena. So I am sad to say this in this situation, but I will be supporting this motion. Thank you.