Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, before we went to a full cost recovery model for the pricing of the products, there were some communities that were paying more than the actual cost of product in that community and helping some of the smaller communities. We've had to make the change because it was deemed not to be fair to those communities that would have to pay more than what it cost for them to get that product to the community. The stabilization fund itself would come into impact in the areas and times when refuelling does happen. So there would be no changes throughout the year as long as we did not run short of product and resupply at another time of the year. The goal is with our tankage in the communities and with the expected usage of the fuel that we have in those communities, we should not be running out of product. So there wouldn't be an impact until the following resupply time.
It was asked earlier how many communities are serviced by barge. We have six communities serviced by barge alone. There are two other communities who receive barge shipments along with winter road shipments. So there are eight communities by barge, but they also receive winter shipments and that can change the price, so it wouldn't be on an annual basis. So the communities we serve through the petroleum products division are somewhat protected from the day-to-day fluctuations that we feel in the larger communities where it is serviced by the private sector. That is both a good thing and a bad thing, because through a community in the private sector, the price of the product would climb and be adjusted monthly or daily, in some cases, whereas in our case, the price would not be adjusted until we had a resupply and there could be a significant difference between a previous year's product price and the new price we pay on the same product. That's what we found ourselves facing this summer. Thank you.