Thank you, Madam Chair. The Member is correct; there were three major areas that the money was identified for, the key being what would be acceptable for the two parties or all the parties involved in terms of usage. For example, we are proposing in some of the initiatives we would like to see funded to basically upgrade our infrastructure to provide service to dementia, long-term care, those types of things. The federal government normally has a great reluctance to see money spent on capital projects when they see it as designated for program use. So we are trying to negotiate with them to make sure that we have the flexibility to meet the same needs, but through the way that is most appropriate for us.

In the area of medical travel, what we have done is we didn't move ahead with the increase to the co-payment, which was initially on the list for reductions for the department. We didn't move on that. So in some cases, we've already made the decision to put the money back. We've left the funding for the third year of the alcohol and drug strategy. We are going to move on that and when the money finally comes in, we hopefully will use that federal money to offset that. It's the same as the issue with the Joe Greenland Centre. That was on the books and that is a facility that's since been deemed necessary. So we are going to offset that by some of the federal money. So we have identified some of the areas where we would like to put the money to use, some we have already moved on, others we haven't. Negotiation with the federal government takes time. Thank you.