Thank you, we certainly want to work with all communities, Simpson as well, and I want to assure the Member we don't believe there will be any diminishment of the service that's currently offered in Simpson. We don't believe the materials are being separated. They are in fact being collected and then forwarded on from there. So that largely is the role of the community depot and that will remain the same. Simpson will still be a community depot.
Also, at some of the smaller communities you won't find the details of this program in the legislation because they aren't there. The details of the program are in the regs that we're developing. So these regulations are what we're working through with our advisory committee and there are a whole range of stakeholders on the advisory committee to advise us on the details of this program to make sure that they make sense and we don't do, as the Member has pointed out, things that are at cross purposes with our intentions here.
So the details of the program will be in the regs being developed. We, I think, imagine our vision, for instance a C-can sized storage facility being set up in a smaller community, and before I would think we would start flying materials around we'd probably add another C-can to ensure that we had the most cost-effective approach possible. I don't want this to be a program we've got to subsidize and, therefore, I don't think it makes sense to be flying glass and aluminium around the Northwest Territories and I take the Member's point. We certainly will take his advice. We will work very closely with the community of Simpson to make sure there isn't a diminishment of the service that they currently enjoy and I think in future the expansion of this program and future programs that this is the first program under this legislation, we'll take a very close look at that community, which, I think the Member is right, is well poised for this kind of development and program. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.