Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. I was just trying to convey to the Minister that it's already not making sense at all. I appreciate his concern about generating revenue and sustaining the three existing ones, but it just doesn't make sense when you are going to be spending all kinds of money trying to make money. It's just not making sense at all, Mr. Chair. So I just want to convey to the Minister that yes his logic is well thought out, but once you apply it that's where I'm thinking the practicality of the program just doesn't fit at all. I'm telling you that's what the legislation calls for. If the bins in Nahanni Butte are full in the summertime, they have to fly it to Hay River and that's a huge cost. That's like a charter cost to get it from Nahanni Butte to Hay River and the Minister talked about practicality and saving dollars and making dollars, but if they are going to be spending a whole lot because your legislation straps you or obligates you to do it, it just doesn't make sense.
Here we have an opportunity to say okay, we'll make Fort Simpson at least a sub-depot, we can get the stuff there from the smaller communities and the communities up further north, package them and then perhaps get them to Hay River and that's what I've been trying to convey to the Minister. At least we're going to have to do that because I know that there's going to be a cost savings there. Will the Minister look at that and take this heads-up notice that you know you're defending a program based on a high level research and I'm basing what I'm saying on the practicality aspects, because Simpson and the people that have been running the recovery program there for the past 20 years know what they are talking about because they've been actually dealing with this. So will the Minister look at revisiting this whole notion today before it's too late, Mr. Chair? Thank you.