Thank you, Madam Chairperson. As I see this, our job is to build our communities one modular or doublewide at a time. That is what we are doing here, building our communities.
Madam Chairperson, the problem here is some of the issues that we have are...We changed the communities the moment that we said we were going to put one of these in there. We are going into communities that had primarily social housing and now we are introducing a market housing initiative and it is changing these markets. It is never going to be perfect, no matter what we do. I can't support this motion right now, especially when it has something like essential community workers because it takes out the flexibility that they may need. I don't think that this is going to work and I really hope that Mr. Braden will reconsider and vote against this motion...
---Laughter
...because it doesn't provide the flexibility the department needs. I think in the first paragraph it talks about working harder and making sure that this is more stringent and the costs are under control. I think that the department has already got the message that there were concerns the first time around, and I'm sure Mr. Krutko got that message loud and clear from all of us, that we are really concerned about this. The headhunters have taken notes and names and we will be watching next year, very closely, on how this one works out. We have Mr. Krutko on the top of the list. I will be voting against this motion because I just don't think that it is productive to the long-term needs of the communities and, like I said earlier, this evening, which at the rate we are going was probably about five hours ago, these are necessary items in these communities to build capacity in these communities. I will be voting against this motion I don't think it is productive to the needs. Thank you.