Thank you, Mr. Chairman. My point is that if there were infractions of the Criminal Code and there was a serious rise in the statistics related to crimes committed, this government would be obligated to respond to that. If that required more financial resources, they would also be obligated to find those resources to deal with that. You wouldn't just turn a blind eye to the crime and say, oh, well, we don't have the money to deal with that.
The point I'm trying to get to, Mr. Chairman, is that when the government wants to do something or wants to find money for something or needs to find money for something, they always do. I want to say with respect to the money required to keep this remand facility in Hay River going, if the government wanted to find the money -- and it isn't like they don't have the support of the Members on this side of the House, they certainly do -- can I remind Members, this is a consensus government and there's more of us than there are of them, Mr. Chairman, and we say leave it there. So will the Minister come back with a supplementary appropriation to finance the continuation, if he cannot find it from within even with 50 vacant positions in his department, will he commit to coming back with a supplementary appropriation to continue to offer these services, which he's already stated are in good facilities with well-trained, dedicated employees, in a region...This is not the Yukon. We don't want it to be the Yukon. We want sustainable, viable regions and communities in the Northwest Territories. That has always been the philosophy of this government. This kick we're on right now with centralization of everything is very dangerous. We have to stop it. Will the Minister come back with a supplementary appropriation to ensure the ongoing services, which have been historically provided in Hay River at the South Mackenzie Correctional Centre will continue? Thank you, Mr. Chairman.