Mr. Chair, the members of the standing committees went to some great lengths to go over the business plans and put their ideas out there on the table. If the Minister doesn't support the remand, that is quite another thing. Then he needs to say that he doesn't support the remand expenditure because he can't say that the Members here don't. We have been pretty clear and concise about that. I am really glad that the Minister brought up the issue of all-day kindergarten because, when I started questioning the Minister in the House about this whole issue of reinstating the remand, he wanted to have a sidebar discussion with me. That was one of the things he brought up. I think all-day kindergarten is something he wants to do. But what he has to understand is this isn't his choice. This is a collective thing. That is why we call it a consensus government. It doesn't matter what the Minister wants. It matters what the will of the House is and the will of the people we represent. We said that was what we want. So don't throw it out there like a menu and say, do you

want this more than this? That is not the Minister's job to do that. I know he wants all-day kindergarten more than he wants remand facilities in Hay River, because he told me that. It is not about what he wants. It is about what we want, and we put him there to oversee this. When we say that is what we want, then it is his job to go back to FMB and get that and to make that argument; not to go back there and say I'm not interested in that, I want all-day kindergarten. Thank you, Mr. Chair.