Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I was holding back on the questions for WCB because I believe that the AOC is working on the response to the work that the committee has done, but the Minister's answers to the Member for Great Slave has intrigued me on this issue so I would like to ask the Minister for more information about what it is exactly that the WCB is going out to the stakeholders on. Does that suggest that the WCB is now ready to change the policies that would be more in line with the Valic and Martin decision, which is different from what the corporation has been telling us? The information I have is that it's the corporation's position that their policies are in line with these decisions and that no changes had to be made. Another change I've just heard from the Minister is the fact that the corporation is not going back to the Supreme Court to have them look at the constitutionality of whatever it was doing with Valic, which was always my position. I always thought that the corporation had all the information it needed to make its own decisions. It's good that it's not going back to court and using that as a process of delay. But I'd like to know exactly what the corporation's position is. Thank you.
Sandy Lee on Question 163-15(5): WCB Policy On Chronic Pain - Valic Decision
In the Legislative Assembly on October 23rd, 2006. See this statement in context.
Question 163-15(5): WCB Policy On Chronic Pain - Valic Decision
Item 6: Oral Questions
October 22nd, 2006
Page 399
See context to find out what was said next.