So I like to get back to the report itself. It is an...(inaudible)...report. Don't be surprised what our House does and doesn't want to do. Just like for the first time we heard a nay in the House the other day. It's not shocking to say no to a committee report. Assemblies, not only ours but throughout the world, do it all the time. They commission these huge reports and they don't accept the recommendations. They do it all the time. It's not that there is anything new here. We are not reinventing the wheel when we are presenting Bill 14, basically the status quo with a realignment.
I know that the honourable Tlicho Member and the Tlicho Government made a good case, a good presentation for better representation. I believe they will get it, but maybe not today. It's got to be put off until the next time.
I concur; we are not under-represented. When I think about the court case and talking with former Members of that era, let's say, what happened then is there were gross cases of under-representation, there were gross cases of very large constituencies and then the tension and the judge that made a decision for all those extra MLAs took all that into consideration. Today, like I said, the first thing I went to was the numbers. I don't know how any court would rule against us saying that constitutionally people's voices are not being heard. I do not believe that for a minute.
So with that, I am not convinced that the courts will tell us that we are under-represented. I am not convinced that the court will rule in the favour of more MLAs. I am not convinced that we need to improve our legislative numbers. With that, Madam Chair, I conclude my statements. I will be supporting Bill 14 as it is. Thank you.