Well, thank you, Mr. Speaker. Thanks to some of my colleagues who are supporting the motion. We are trying to listen to what constituents are telling us. I really challenge the government to be big enough to listen to what they are being asked to do. If it's not working, let's go with something that works. Lord knows, if we find anything else that's working in the government, are we going to try to change that too? I think this was a program that was working. I think we should stick with it. We've received numerous concerns from constituents. I know I have personally and I want to act on those. I want to do what's right for the constituent here. I really do.
Talk about growing pains and maybe that's all true, but the fact of the matter is we're doing what residents are wanting us to do, what's good for the residents, not what's good for the departments. Isn't that why we are here, to do what's good for the residents and not what is good for departments? I thank the Members that supported me on this motion. I think it's a good motion. I think it's a motion that if you went from community to community and asked everybody if it's working, I would say 99.9 percent of the communities, LHOs, would tell you this is not a program that's working. Seven months is a long time. It's a simple little process. Get your rent assessed, pay it and you're done, but they've complicated things again. So, Mr. Speaker, I was more than glad to present this motion, because I believe I was doing what residents want me to do and I think the government should look at that and do what residents want them to do, too. Thank you.